2 ms·
I've heard that the Boca Chica operations are currently a really small % of the overall SpaceX budget given how cheap the materials and low the consequences are
by bpodgursky 6y ago
I've heard that the Boca Chica operations are currently a really small % of the overall SpaceX budget given how cheap the materials and low the consequences are.
(it's just steel + engines, and since there's no human or customer component, there's much less process than around the commercial launches)
- powderpig 6y agoI'd imagine the most complex engine ever to use the full flow staged combustion cycle has a large price tag.
- phpnode 6y agoPresumably a vast majority of that cost is in R&D rather than manufacturing.
- nickik 6y agoIts not that high, because its designed from the beginning to be produced in the 100s per year. Its probably being produced faster almost every other rocket engine (outside of SpaceX own) and maybe some much simpler engines from Russia or China. They are producing SN100ish by now. A while ago they said 2 million $, already cheap for such an engine. Target is more like 200k$. So likely its between 1-2M. That would make it only about 6M per flight based on the engine.
- chasd00 6y agoEven more amazing when you consider a full flow combustion rocket engine is an engineering masterpiece. The design and materials science are priceless.
- inglor_cz 6y agoWell, one of the aims of the Raptor project is good/cheap manufacturability of engines. They do plan to produce them in massive series. The really costly phase is probably already done - the design work and early experiments.
- mr_toad 6y agoRoughly $1 million, marginal cost (if Wikipedia is to be believed). Each 3 engine Starship prototype conceivably only costs several million. Compared to what NASA is paying for the SLS engines (over $140 million each), it’s loose change.