5 ms·
Still, it’s obvious that the CCP is more competent in executing centralized, longterm plans, and has much less cultural/institutional pressure not to seriously
by Siira 5y ago
Still, it’s obvious that the CCP is more competent in executing centralized, longterm plans, and has much less cultural/institutional pressure not to seriously screw over people.
- smnrchrds 5y agoIt also has much less ability to screw over people unless they live in China. China cannot project power the way US can.
- djhn 5y agoCannot for now.
- Teever 5y agoThis isn't totally accurate. You are correct that China cannot project power in the sense that they can't easily invade a country or level shattering economic sanctions but they have proven themselves quite capable of targetting individuals in other nations both online and in the real world. Either way, there is a moral imperative to prevent China from gaining the ability to project power the way the US can. The US being able to project that kind of power is shitty, and the two entities being able to do that is even shittier.
- jrochkind1 5y agoI appreciate that you recognize the US being able to do it is shitty. I wonder how many non-Americans think two entities being able to do it is better than one, because at least they can counter-balance each other. Not just with force; I was recently thinking about how the US during the cold war tried to be "nice" to the "third world" to keep them out of the "sphere of influence" of the Soviet Union. Currently China is trying to project it's "soft power" that way too to get less developed countries into it's patronage, but the US isn't really doing that at the moment (see for instance approaches to distributing covid vaccine...). I (who is a usa citizen) personally am not really sure which is preferable, only one super-power, or two. Either way the world is in for a rough ride.
- k12sosse 5y agoWhen it's just the US, AXIS powers lose. When it's China too, the world loses.
- artificialLimbs 5y agoLet me assure you, Chinese power is BAD. And I personally hate using that word, but here it is warranted. At least in the U.S., we have the intent of moral fiber permeating through our founding document, and probably at least half the population still fervently believes in these principles or tries to behave as though they matter. China doesn't give a fuck. Their government is a communist dictatorship, and their sole concern is the expansion of their power through force.
- belatw 5y agoThat “intent of moral fiber permeating through our founding document” failed to do achieve much good for the the peoples of Yemen, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Cuba, Vietnam, African slaves, or Native Americans. Those who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
- krageon 5y ago> in the U.S., we have [...] moral fiber It's so hard to take you seriously when you make claims like this. Nobody cares about your founding documents, folks look at what the US does. And what it does is send drone strikes to hit schools, it bullies countries into doing what it wants without offering anything in return, etc. I genuinely cannot currently see a worse superpower.
- artificialLimbs 5y agoWe also invented air conditioning and cars and airplanes and refridgerators and the internet. Global poverty is at a historic low right now. Violent crime, at least here in the U.S., is at an all time low. With gratitude as a dominant force in ones's life, one is able to step back and see pictures other than what one wishes to see. One is able to stop buying into hysteria. It is sad that some politicians use military as their play tool for nefarious purposes. Biden sent troops into Syria almost immediately upon assuming his current position. Reprehensible.