It's actually even worse than that. I don't have access to the paper, but they had 8 conditions (3 sugars + placebo * fasting|non fasting). That's basically s

It's actually even worse than that. I don't have access to the paper, but they had 8 conditions (3 sugars + placebo * fasting|non fasting). That's basically six people per condition. I assume that they did some kind of repeated measures design (although the abstract doesn't say), but the numbers reported are most likely to be statistical noise, especially without preregistration or standard analytical methods.