5 ms·
How did it take so long for India to have a second wave?
by ppf 5y ago
How did it take so long for India to have a second wave?
- systemvoltage 5y agoDynamics of the virus spread is quite interesting. 3Blue1Brown made a fascinating video about how an epidemic spreads: https://youtu.be/gxAaO2rsdIs https://youtu.be/gxAaO2rsdIs
- baybal2 5y agoI'd say it's a third wave by now already
- spikels 5y agoI would like to know this too. Why didn’t it take off last year and why now? My prior is that the virus took time to evolve to be hyper-infectious in the local conditions. Fits timescale and may fit theoretical models (many suggest viruses become more infectious but less deadly - not sure if this is the case in India). Would be great to see good research on this but it will take many months. Early reports and analysis are likely to be wrong.
- intended 5y agoYes. In hindsight this type of analysis is obviously critical. Sadly it seems india only started focusing on improving sequencing in December 2020.
- divbzero 5y agoThe US too [1] has been slow to implement large-scale sequencing efforts. We have the technology to track the virus more closely [2] [3] but seem oddly unhurried to deploy it widely. [1]: https://www.statnews.com/2021/04/06/stem-the-pandemic-national-covid-19-genomic-sequencing-effort/ https://www.statnews.com/2021/04/06/stem-the-pandemic-nation... [2]: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/wastewater-surveillance.html https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/wast... [3]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33468686/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33468686/
- mxcrossb 5y ago> evolve to be hyper-infectious in the local conditions I’ve never heard that idea before, very interesting. I wonder if we will figure out if certain mutations work “better” on certain populations, environmental conditions, etc.
- ppf 5y agoHow did it do that, while not just creating a regular second wave like most of the Western world?
- bpodgursky 5y agoWeather / season is what I've seen speculated the most.
- chunkyguy 5y agoCOVID never actually went away. Just that the people and the government ignored it until it mutated to a deadly version.
- dehrmann 5y ago> until it mutated to a deadly version Do we know this, yet?
- ashishmax31 5y agoDo we have evidence that the virus has mutated into something more deadly? Such mutation is clearly not beneficial to the virus. My guess would be that the virus mutated into something with a higher R-0. Read more about the optimal virulence here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_virulence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_virulence
- nnq 5y agoOptimal virulence is kinda bullshit with rapidly evolving things on small timescales... Sure, if a mutation that makes it give deadly miocarditis 50% of the cases pops up, that strain would have a clear evolutionary disadvantage ...but if a strain that gives 2x worse pneumonia (and maybe a 2x death rate, that overall is still low) with 4x more coughing evolve, it will have an evolutionary advantage, more caughing => more virus in the air etc. So you absolutely can have viruses evolving towards increased lethality, as long as people infected with the new strain spread the virus more and don't die too soon... you won't get to smth. evolving its way to 80% lethality, but it can very well evolve from <1% to ...50% (scary!). The whole optimism about patterns of viral evolution is 100% wrong, unless you're thinking at very large timescales, and in environments where humans have not added so many accelerator factors!
- ppf 5y agoOf course it didn't go away. So you are saying that Western countries, that took all the Covid precautions, had an early second wave. However, a densely populated country that took very few precautions didn't have a second wave, but a deadly version months later? Do you have any references for the idea that India is suffering from a new variant of Covid? For that matter, do we have any accurate information about the situation in India, except some choice photos in the media?