4 ms·
I need a decoder ring for this. This is a court order in some case v Exxon. Whats it got to do with FISA or Clinton?
by stefan_ 6y ago
I need a decoder ring for this. This is a court order in some case v Exxon. Whats it got to do with FISA or Clinton?
- dboreham 6y agoNothing?
- nickodell 6y agoAlex Oh worked for a law firm which represents Exxon. That law firm was accused of obstructing a deposition to avoid providing answers to the other side. [1] >ORDERS defense counsel to show cause by May 14, 2021 why sanctions should not be imposed under Rule 11 (b)(3) for alleging that plaintiffs' counsel was agitated, disrespectful, and unhinged during the deposition despite a lack of record evidence supporting those allegations. See Mem. Op. 29-31. >ORDERS defendants to serve a copy of this order on Ms. Oh. Was Alex Oh specifically responsible for this conduct? The order doesn't say. What does this have to do with Clinton? Nothing, except in a six-degrees-of-kevin-bacon sense. [1]: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.14559/gov.uscourts.dcd.14559.799.0.pdf https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.14559/g...
- ipaddr 6y agoHe was senior enough to share the blame because was more likely aware if not involved.
- the_optimist 6y agoMelissa Hodgman is Peter Strozk's wife. Peter was (is??) the FBI-counter-intel agent notorious for his work on "Crossfire Hurricane," the Hillary Clinton email server, the "lying to the FBI" charges against Michael Flynn, and the questionable representations made repeatedly by the FBI to the FISA court.
- cyanydeez 6y agoby "notorious" you mean in the far right muck making mschine
- dionian 6y agosounds like a purely left-wing characterization of the facts
- sthnblllII 6y agoNo, the far-left actually distrusts the FBI and intelligence agencies (it always has since at least Vietnam) and called out Russiagate as a mostly fabricated distraction from the evils of neoliberalism and globalization. It's the centrists who promote hate against Russia and China. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WRoTGlQ4JMA https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WRoTGlQ4JMA
- cowpig 6y agojeez.. apparently this is all true: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Strzok https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Strzok I am surprised that someone married to this person is acting as a high-ranking official in the executive branch of government controlled by the Democratic party
- DevKoala 6y agoThe surprises never end.
- newacct583 6y agoHodgman has been at the SEC for years, that's not a partisan position. And she held the same office under Trump.
- kodah 6y agoWhat does any of this have to do with the SEC? You're also passing credence that Peter Strozk is somehow notorious but I don't think that is by any means a universal truth. In my (mostly) independent circles he's just an agent who put some idiotic personal opinions on a government cellphone. His work has seemed to bear truth, and if anything things that couldn't be directly proven were withheld, which would be the mark of a good investigator.
- newacct583 6y agoThe scare quote are flying pretty fast there. It's worth pointing out that Strzok's crime consists of personally being a democrat (probably) and thinking that the target of his investigation (Trump) was guilty. In the world of partisan media, of course, that's essentially capital treason. But to the rest of us? Meh. Let's be honest: There are probably republicans in the government right now texting each other about how they hate Biden. And no one does, or should, care.
- cwwc 6y agoWhat?!????
- unyttigfjelltol 6y agoThe judge wrote an explanation but hasn't released it yet, because it's under seal. >ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and to file a joint report by May 6, 2021, informing the Court whether they object to any portion of the Memorandum Opinion being unsealed. ...