4 ms·
That sounds like semantics. Who needs a privacy-respecting operating system when a popular privacy-invasive operating system runs the Linux software just fine?
by meowster 6y ago
That sounds like semantics.
Who needs a privacy-respecting operating system when a popular privacy-invasive operating system runs the Linux software just fine?
- mixmastamyk 6y agoShould be a top-level comment.
- Dylan16807 6y agoYou can't EEE if you don't Extend. It's not semantics. If you stay at "Embrace" you have Edge or Windows Terminal, nobody's going to get mad about those.
- jodrellblank 6y agoWho needs to justify or explain how "run Linux in a VM" leads to extinguishing anything, or how it will stop you forking your own Linux or runing any of the distros unrelated to Microsoft/WSL2 any time you like, when you can simply copypaste 20 year old fearmongering?