4 ms·
How do you figure? The way I've understood it is part of the point of CLA's is to allow license changes, and that without them no license changes are possible
by jrochkind1 6y ago
How do you figure?
The way I've understood it is part of the point of CLA's is to allow license changes, and that without them no license changes are possible to community projects. Because all the contributors own the copyright to the code they contributed, which they licensed under the existing license. To change the license you'd need to contact all the contributors and get permission (so okay, not impossible, just infeasible). The CLA is getting that permission in advance, to let some controlling body change copyright later.
- nopzor 6y agoanyone can change the license of apache software, without any permission. the right to do so is built into the apache license.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- dec0dedab0de 6y agoI thought the point of CLA's in general is to stop contributors from revoking their license, or claiming the entire program is a collaborative work and that they have joint copyright over all of it. I don't think either has ever happened in open source, but I believe is possible, at least in the US.