3 ms·
> Because these depth readings are being fed to applications as if they were good representations No they aren't. Depth is always extremely noisy and needs to
by CyberDildonics 6y ago
> Because these depth readings are being fed to applications as if they were good representations
No they aren't. Depth is always extremely noisy and needs to be managed and filtered in lots of different ways.
> And that's the perception level.
Depth isn't always looked at directly. This is about camera techniques. What you are talking about seems like some pet project ideas that are loosely connected to depth cameras.
- ilaksh 6y agoTrue, they are actually kind of pet project ideas now. But they are drawn from popular neuroscience and similar to some existing approaches or beginnings. I believe that this type of predictive and generative system will be the paradigm for perception in the near future. And of course it's not just the raw data being used at the application level in current real-world applications. But what is fed in doesn't take into account most of the type of information I am talking about.