4 ms·

What does this have to do with a microsoft page on indirect time of flight?

• ilaksh 6y ago
  It's a different approach to the same problem. For starters, you don't assume that you can take one sample (or pair of samples) and just use that. Because these depth readings are being fed to applications as if they were good representations. What I am saying is, for one thing, before you try to really use that type of information, you integrate more data and do a lot more work. And that's the perception level.
  • CyberDildonics 6y ago
    > Because these depth readings are being fed to applications as if they were good representations No they aren't. Depth is always extremely noisy and needs to be managed and filtered in lots of different ways. > And that's the perception level. Depth isn't always looked at directly. This is about camera techniques. What you are talking about seems like some pet project ideas that are loosely connected to depth cameras.
    • ilaksh 6y ago
      True, they are actually kind of pet project ideas now. But they are drawn from popular neuroscience and similar to some existing approaches or beginnings. I believe that this type of predictive and generative system will be the paradigm for perception in the near future. And of course it's not just the raw data being used at the application level in current real-world applications. But what is fed in doesn't take into account most of the type of information I am talking about.