3 ms·
Are you seriously comparing owning shares with taking advantage of the need to have a home to take ~30% of someone's monthly income?
by scambier 5y ago
Are you seriously comparing owning shares with taking advantage of the need to have a home to take ~30% of someone's monthly income?
- chii 5y agothey are very comparable. Owning shares in a company that takes money to provide essential services? That has been the model of capitalism - fee for service - for a long time, and it has worked. The service gets provided, at the right price that the market can bear ,and still produce a profit for those providing the service. The alternative is to not have that service provided at all!
- effingwewt 5y agoThen please stop providing the service. If we had no landlords renting we would all own domiciles. So please, stop providing these 'services'