As the original article[0] states, the report explicitly says that public knowledge of the report would threaten the existance of KPN due to the massive loss of

As the original article[0] states, the report explicitly says that public knowledge of the report would threaten the existance of KPN due to the massive loss of trust in the company. The report contains the sentence "Ongecontroleerde en ongeautoriseerde toegang vanuit China heeft na 28 oktober 2009 daadwerkelijk plaatsgevonden" which translates to "Uncontrolled and unauthorized access from China actually took place after October 28, 2009" KPN has zero incentive to admit to anything and every incentive to deny everything. I'd take such a PR statement with a grain of salt. [0]: https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/huawei-kon-alle-gesprekken-van-mobiele-kpn-klanten-afluisteren-inclusief-die-van-de-premier~bd1aece1/ https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/huawei-kon-alle...