3 ms·
That’s how you find holes, by running trials. Remember that this isn’t a privacy regression; they’re trying to find an ad-friendly replacement for third party c
by SpicyLemonZest 6y ago
That’s how you find holes, by running trials. Remember that this isn’t a privacy regression; they’re trying to find an ad-friendly replacement for third party cookies, which can do cross-site tracking without any need for holes.
- vxNsr 6y agoIt’s a regression bec they’re taking control away from the users, you can decide to not allow 3rd party cookies, but you can’t opt out of FLoC very easily.
- SpicyLemonZest 6y agoIt's my understanding (source: https://blog.malwarebytes.com/cybercrime/privacy/2021/04/millions-of-chrome-users-quietly-added-to-googles-floc-pilot/ https://blog.malwarebytes.com/cybercrime/privacy/2021/04/mil...) that users who opt out of third-party cookies are also opted out of the FLoC trial. I do agree that more granular controls would have been ideal.