4 ms·
You may not be full on anti-vax, but you're very clearly anti-science. > I expect I've had all variants No evidence of this. > and apparently my immune syste
by thelean12 5y ago
You may not be full on anti-vax, but you're very clearly anti-science.
> I expect I've had all variants
No evidence of this.
> and apparently my immune system is on top of it
No evidence of this.
> in which case there's nothing to pass on
Even if the above were true, we don't know how long you'd have immunity.
> and the people in my area clearly don't care if I did.
They would if they caught it and had severe symptoms.
- tryonenow 5y agoResorting to calling people "anti-science" is just as counterproductive and unnecessary as calling them "anti-vax". You're only solidifying animosity and mistrust. People have every right to question what they're being told by the same governments who mishandled this epidemic from the start - especially since there such strong political incentives that aren't necessarily aligned with scientifically based recommendations.
- jimbokun 5y agoYou are vaguely waving your hand at unspecified "political incentives" with absolutely no specifics or evidence of anything. I mean, you can question anything, but that has about zero value. Answers with evidence backing them have value.
- ironmagma 5y agoEverything should start from a place of questioning. If there is data and the data makes sense, that can replace questioning with certainty. But often the data has a limited or tenuous connection, possibly even a fraudulent connection. This is why it’s important to actually read the studies and understand the science, not just to hand wave it away as “evidence = value.”