5 ms·
A lot of jobs seem like modern slavery. Rather than focus on the deliverable, managers and people who pay money focus more on the "controlling someone" aspect.
by windex 6y ago
A lot of jobs seem like modern slavery. Rather than focus on the deliverable, managers and people who pay money focus more on the "controlling someone" aspect. Tech has enabled this in a big way.
- simple_phrases 6y ago"Slavery with extra steps" often comes to mind.
- DC1350 6y agoIt’s slavery as a service. Great for saving costs because you only pay for the time that you actually use, and you can outsource the maintenance of the service to the provider. If real slavery was still legal it wouldn’t even be used because the paycheque to paycheque employee model is so much more cost efficient.
- simple_phrases 6y agoYeah, you need to feed, house and give free healthcare to slaves. That's not happening any time soon.
- drummer 6y agoIt's coming. "You will own nothing and be happy."
- asdff 6y agoI wonder what it is going to look like when finally every single dollar you have is sucked up automatically by the month. The scales tip by the year. People in major cities are already paying 50% of their wages to their landlord alone. That's a degenerate economy, not a productive one. Eventually we will reach an equilibrium where there will be just enough vultures out there to eat exactly how many slices there are left in the pie. Complete extraction of 'disposable' income will be achieved this century. For working people in major cities, some are already being completely extracted like this, having to work multiple jobs to keep a roof overhead and bellies fed with no time to do something that isn't low skilled labor for capital.
- minikites 6y agoWhy do you think so many US businesses fight against universal healthcare? Employers want every possible measure of control over their employees that they can get.
- nvusuvu 6y agoI never thought about it like this. This makes a lot of sense and is blowing my mind. I've worked at the same company for the last 16 years partly because of fear of losing healthcare.
- makotech222 6y agoIf you're receptive to that way of thinking, try taking a look into Marxist theories, which incorporate that way of thinking into a political philosophy.
- cosmodisk 6y agoHave a look at my 2nd earliest submission about full employment and the consequences it would bring, it's pretty refreshing reading.
- grecy 6y agoCome and live in a country where healthcare is not tied to your job in any remote way, and see how differently people behave. It really is night and day. When my brother came back to Australia after 5 years away he said the biggest thing he noticed was not driving on the wrong side of the road, not the weather, not the food, not the accents - it was how people are treated at their jobs.
- brailsafe 6y agoEven in Canada though, Dental is pretty much tied to your job. It's not as significant, but I've only ever had legitimate dental coverage during school and for 3 months over the course of a decade.
- 6y ago
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- bpodgursky 6y agoI know you mean well, but nothing except literal slavery is slavery, and it's trivializing of enormous injustices to even lightly equate the two. Chattel slavery involved practically-legal murder, beating, children born into slavery, rape, and a laundry list of horrifying things. This is bad, but we can come up with a term for "oppressive labor conditions" which is not "slavery".
- simple_phrases 6y agoChattel slavery is only but one kind of slavery.
- morelisp 6y agoExperience demonstrates that there may be a slavery of wages only a little less galling and crushing in its effects than chattel slavery, and that this slavery of wages must go down with the other. There is nothing more common now than the remark that the physical condition of the freedmen of the South is immeasurably worse than in the time of slavery; that in respect to food, clothing and shelter they are wretched, miserable and destitute; that they are worse masters to themselves than their old masters were to them. To add insult to injury, the reproach of their condition is charged upon themselves. An amazing point getting recognized more and more.
- matheusmoreira 6y agoNow we have people being born into practically eternal poverty and forced to toil constantly under horrible conditions in order to avoid economic punishments.
- ohhhhhh 6y agoIf only everyone had a choice in where they spend their time and energy. Oh they do.
- asdff 6y agoIf only everyone had the money and time to actually make that choice. If you are living paycheck to paycheck, that means you can't afford to move without going into more debt. Moving costs money, even just moving across town. I'm usually out a good 1-2k when I move apartments just in my town after all application fees and deposits have been paid. My last landlord was a management corporation that figured out a way to whittle down my $1800 security deposit from my last apartment to $38 from things like "scratched floors" and "dents," so the deposit is rarely that. If I was broke, moving would be impossible. If you are broke you are gonna have an impossible time lining up work wherever you are going. No low skilled place is going to hire an out of area candidate when there are local applicants. You will have to show up from say, expensive south central LA to 'cheaper' boise, having spent hundreds of dollars in gas along the way, and now need to put money down on a security deposit. Since your credit is probably bad since you are broke, you will probably have to pay a huge deposit. My very first apartment when I had no credit asked for three months of rent as a deposit. If you are broke you don't have money for gas or these deposits, and will have had to go into debt. So now you are in a new area where you no absolutely no one, with no job, thousands in debt. You might spend the rest of your working life trying to get out of the hole you just dug for yourself, and that's assuming you don't get sick along the way. It's no wonder why so many people are homeless, and why most of the working poor in cities like LA live in overcrowded apartments rather than "going elsewhere" like wisecrack comments on the internet seem to suggest they do. I don't think people on this board have any concept of how expensive it is to be poor in this country, and this comment is case in point.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]