3 ms·
Starlink has said that they're planning on offering a roaming use-case, but they aren't there yet (https://www.slashgear.com/spacex-starlink-cell-location-limit
by mdasen 6y ago
Starlink has said that they're planning on offering a roaming use-case, but they aren't there yet (https://www.slashgear.com/spacex-starlink-cell-location-limit-digital-nomad-rv-roaming-applications-04658114/ https://www.slashgear.com/spacex-starlink-cell-location-limi...).
Part of the issue is that Starlink cells are going to be very limited in capacity for the foreseeable future: https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2020/09/analyst-probes-speed-claims-of-starlinks-broadband-satellites.html https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2020/09/analyst-probes.... Cowen suggests that Starlink "should eventually be able to serve 485,000 simultaneous data streams in the USA with 100Mbps speeds or 1.5 million streams with over-subscription." That's in late 2026 or 2027 when Starlink has deployed around 12,000 satellites (they're at about 10% of that now). If a bunch of people decide to bring Starlinks to a popular area, the cell for that are simply won't have the bandwidth to support all those users. Imagine people going to Burning Man with lots of Starlinks or bringing their Starlink when they go on vacation. It's not meant to be a portable WiFi hotspot. I'm guessing that portable use might cost more since Starlink has to assume that you might be taking up capacity in places where bandwidth is more scarce.
In terms of preordering, you can order without a street address. Starlink's website says, "Can't find your address? Try a Plus Code with City" (and links to https://support.google.com/maps/answer/7047426?co=GENIE.Platform%3DAndroid&hl=en https://support.google.com/maps/answer/7047426?co=GENIE.Plat...).
One thing I would also point out about Starlink is that they only guarantee that you'll be able to use the $500 dish (plus $50 shipping) for 12 months before being forced to replace it. Starlink is new tech and I'm guessing SpaceX wants to be able to upgrade things without maintaining support for less-efficient, older equipment. I don't expect them to force upgrades on people on a whim, but they do spell out that the $500 dish might not be allowed on their network a year after your purchase. I don't think they want to make customers unhappy, but I think they want to make sure they can upgrade their network without getting sued for not supporting expensive customer-purchased equipment forever.
- Scoundreller 6y ago> Imagine people going to Burning Man with lots of Starlinks or bringing their Starlink when they go on vacation. I deeply hope people aren’t going to those to download OS updates and watch Netflix. Might have some crazies that feel the need to livestream the whole thing, but should be okay if only a handful at a time.
- londons_explore 6y agoA neat way to prioritize users is to give priority to whoever has downloaded least in the past 24 hours. Then those who abuse the data get slow service and nobody else.
- sgtnoodle 6y agoYou could imagine a handful of starlinks providing the backhaul for public wifi at an event.
- jrnichols 6y ago> Imagine people going to Burning Man with lots of Starlinks or bringing their Starlink when they go on vacation. That is exactly why I would be interested in it. :) Not just Burning Man, but other events. We do special event medical and having some reliable roving internet access like Starlink would be absolutely magical for us.
- londons_explore 6y ago> they only guarantee that you'll be able to use the $500 dish (plus $50 shipping) for 12 months I would guess that if they disconnect your dish from the network, they'll give you a new one for free. I know that isn't what their terms and conditions state, but it would be bad business to do anything else. They'll hope that most users choose to upgrade first (for more speed or other features).
- japanuspus 6y ago$500 is pretty much free for this equipment. Production price is currently around $3000 according to SpaceX president Gwyneth Shotwell [0]. [0]: https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1379457265435078665 https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/1379457265435078665
- coder543 6y agoThat tweet says <$1500. ("less than half the original $3000") 33% of the manufacturing cost isn't nearly free, in my opinion, but it is definitely a loss leader product.
- londons_explore 6y agoSince the antenna can't be used for anything other than receiving starlink service, it isn't really logical not to consider the cost as "$500 + $100/month forever"