4 ms·

Mesh networks are relatively new to the Standard. True LE 5 SoCs should have what you need to get started.

yarcob 6y ago
When I played around with ESP32 when it just came out, the problem was that the toolchains and software just weren't done yet. There were a lot of features that existed on hardware, but without toolchain support, docs, or sample code it was close to impossible to use them. I'm not sure how it works now, but especially for newer stuff I wouldn't rely on the fact that the hardware claims to support something -- if the software isn't there, it just doesn't really mean much.
- dls2016 6y ago
  I'm not familiar with other microcontrollers, but ESP-IDF seems to be very actively developed. I bought a wESP32 a few months ago and initially couldn't figure out how to enable ethernet... came back after some ESP-IDF updates and had it working in 10 minutes. But you are probably correct about the latest chips.
  - gh02t 6y ago
    ESP-IDF is super friendly, I was amazed how easy it was to get it set up and configured compared to my experience with some other embedded toolchains I've used before.
SwaraLink 6y ago
The Bluetooth Mesh standard actually is based on a Bluetooth 4.0 feature set (basic advertising and scanning), so really any BLE device can support it. The problem is that the software is complicated, so typically only newer devices have software support. Many chip vendors have BT mesh implementations, including Nordic, TI, SiLabs, Cypress, Dialog, and ST.
- IshKebab 6y ago
  As I recall it's not a particular good mesh networking standard either. I think all the nodes just blindly rebroadcast all packets. I can't remember the exact details but I remember being disappointed when it was announced and I looked into it.
  - SwaraLink 6y ago
    It’s a little bit better than that, in that only some nodes rebroadcast everything while you can have lower-power nodes be primarily in transmit mode. But yes, I think the spec could use a lot of improvement. It does seem like there’s a lot of momentum in the BT-SIG to grow the standard over a long period of time, and there also are a lot of active contributors, so I do expect it to mature in the future.

When I played around with ESP32 when it just came out, the problem was that the toolchains and software just weren't done yet. There were a lot of features that existed on hardware, but without toolchain support, docs, or sample code it was close to impossible to use them. I'm not sure how it works now, but especially for newer stuff I wouldn't rely on the fact that the hardware claims to support something -- if the software isn't there, it just doesn't really mean much.

dls2016 6y ago
I'm not familiar with other microcontrollers, but ESP-IDF seems to be very actively developed. I bought a wESP32 a few months ago and initially couldn't figure out how to enable ethernet... came back after some ESP-IDF updates and had it working in 10 minutes. But you are probably correct about the latest chips.
- gh02t 6y ago
  ESP-IDF is super friendly, I was amazed how easy it was to get it set up and configured compared to my experience with some other embedded toolchains I've used before.

SwaraLink 6y ago

The Bluetooth Mesh standard actually is based on a Bluetooth 4.0 feature set (basic advertising and scanning), so really any BLE device can support it. The problem is that the software is complicated, so typically only newer devices have software support. Many chip vendors have BT mesh implementations, including Nordic, TI, SiLabs, Cypress, Dialog, and ST.

IshKebab 6y ago
As I recall it's not a particular good mesh networking standard either. I think all the nodes just blindly rebroadcast all packets. I can't remember the exact details but I remember being disappointed when it was announced and I looked into it.
- SwaraLink 6y ago
  It’s a little bit better than that, in that only some nodes rebroadcast everything while you can have lower-power nodes be primarily in transmit mode. But yes, I think the spec could use a lot of improvement. It does seem like there’s a lot of momentum in the BT-SIG to grow the standard over a long period of time, and there also are a lot of active contributors, so I do expect it to mature in the future.