4 ms·
I shared this link in a sibling comment, but here it is again: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/neighborhood-defenders/0677F4F75667B490CBC7A98396DD527A http
by rtlfe 5y ago
I shared this link in a sibling comment, but here it is again: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/neighborhood-defenders/0677F4F75667B490CBC7A98396DD527A https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/neighborhood-defenders/...
A big problem is that local governments place a lot of weight on "community input," but the people giving input don't accurately reflect the community. People who show up to meetings tend to be strongly opposed to change and fit into demographic groups that have a lot of free time, i.e. older, richer, and whiter. This causes a lot of positive changes to be either outright vetoed or delayed indefinitely at the whim of NIMBYs.
- disgruntledphd2 5y agoThis is kinda how democracy works, in all it's terrible glory. Apply your same logic to national elections, and you are essentially saying that the votes of some people should be worth less, and others more. I don't disagree with you that this happens, but I'm not sure that removing the local democratic infrastructure is the right way to solve this problem.