5 ms·

The author of this post cites $55/month as his cost. This is wrong. If it takes him, say, two hours a month to maintain (probably conservative) then if you valu

by api 6y ago

The author of this post cites $55/month as his cost. This is wrong. If it takes him, say, two hours a month to maintain (probably conservative) then if you value those hours at $100/hour the actual cost is $255/month. The reality is probably in excess of $1000/month. This only makes sense for people who have an abundance of spare time, and that's pretty rare these days. Free software for DIY hosting like this is "free as in piano." Like a huge piano sitting on the street with a sign that says "free piano," it is actually not free at all when you factor in the hidden costs.

CharlesW 6y ago
"Free as in free puppy" is my other favorite metaphor. Free software is a gift to the word, but IMO it's important not to undervalue the time and expertise of operationalizing it.
- thih9 6y ago
  It's worth remembering that you can get an expensive puppy too. I.e. choosing proprietary software doesn't mean that time and expertise won't be required. Recent previous discussion at: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26672009 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26672009 .
- sigg3 6y ago
  Free software was always intended as Libre software or Freedom software, though. The main concern is autonomy, not economic costs. I expect you know this already, which is why the puppy analogy sort of fails.
  - CharlesW 6y ago
    Very fair point, since "free puppy" misses the "free as in freedom" aspect. I think it works better than than "free as in beer", which captures part of the CapEx dimension but none of the OpEx dimension.
minitech 6y ago
It’s for people with enough spare time. If you find yourself having to cut your work hours to the tune of $1000/mo (or more realistically, personal time that you value) to self-host some stuff compared to the time it would take to maintain non-self-hosted equivalents, then by all means, don’t – but that’s definitely not how “actual cost” works otherwise. And two hours a month seems high.
slowhand09 6y ago
I would argue yes and no here. If those are two hrs where you are not employed making $100, then its $55. If you have to give up 2 hrs of employed time to maintain this, then yes $255. I love my free time and there is precious little. But I don't think of it as costing ME $100/hr when I wash, dry, and detail my car, especially as I like doing it.
TkTech 6y ago
As a developer, all of the time I spend working on hobby projects (and self-hosting has turned into a hobby) keep me up to date. It's how I learned Kubernetes, it's how I learned Traefik, nginx, and apache before that. It's how I learned how the different packaging and distribution ecosystems work for many different languages and frameworks. I intentionally host and backup some things on AWS, GCloud, and Azure. Other things live on Intel NUCs. I administer a GSuite for the family. The list goes on and on. It gives you the chance to experiment with new tools and toys that you're unlikely to use at your current job. My long-winded point is that all of the things I've picked up have been invaluable to me at work, especially in my time as a contractor where I would be switching between many different stacks. If you want to find a "true" cost for self-hosting, you need to also treat it as training. I don't really believe it's any different from say, a woodworker that has a shop at home. They may spend the workday just doing framing, but odds are good they find the time to make a chair, a bird house, something to keep their skills sharp.
- reaperducer 6y ago
  As a developer, all of the time I spend working on hobby projects (and self-hosting has turned into a hobby) keep me up to date. True for some things, like things that are not at all related to your work. But your job should be actively trying to make you better at your job, and a better person. Large companies like the one I work for hire outside firms to offer classes to the employees for free, and on company time. If there is a new version of a piece of software that is significantly different from an old one, my company pays for the users to go to training, or to train online. This is very common for products like Office or the Adobe suite. But for some reason, as developers, we too often think that we're supposed to better ourselves on our own dime. If it benefits your current employer, the current employer should chip in.
- mattowen_uk 6y ago
  I used to think this too, which is why I was self-hosting (I'm the OP of this thread), but as I've got older, and my interests have shifted, along with no longer needing to be at the bleeding edge of my skill-set (I leave that stuff to the younglings these days), I found that managing my own infrastructure felt more like a chore than a hobby, more so if it's a 'production' system and not a 'lab' environment.
shaan7 6y ago
Well that is only if you look at software/ops as a 100% commercial undertaking. It is not. One way to understand why people self-host is to understand why people self-cook their food. It takes significantly longer to prepare food (get raw material, cut, cook) than ordering it. People still do it for $reasons - some find it fun, some find it cheaper, some find it nice to be able to control the taste, some find it more healthy to know whats going on their plate, and so on. Only concentrating on the dollar cost is too narrow a view, IMO.
- Chris2048 6y ago
  Far fewer people cook their own food for fun versus preparation time not being the only constraint: cost, availability, health, transparency (of prep & ingredients), dependency etc It's common for people to delude themselves into thinking they haven't wasted their time by convincing themselves they did it for fun (or the lols, or whatever) - I'd say the difference is whether they knew )or stated) this upfront, or only after they failed, or had a better solution pointed out to them. 2nd most common also: at least I learnt something / gained xp - which is fair enough, if true. > Only concentrating on the dollar cost is too narrow a view Not if you convey other resources/constraints in dollars. Just attach a dollar-value to your free time, perhaps with discounts for things with side-benefits.
  - shaan7 6y ago
    Fair enough, by "far fewer" you basically mean the same thing I meant by "some". The point was not to have an exhaustive list of the exact reasons behind people cooking. > It's common for people to delude themselves into thinking they haven't wasted their time by convincing themselves they did it for fun I am probably missing some context here because this does not make sense to me. Something is fun because its fun, what does it even mean for someone to forcibly convince themselves of something that is otherwise? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > Just attach a dollar-value to your free time I do that when someone asks me to do a project for them in my free time, so I can know what to charge them. But there is little value in assigning a dollar-value for time that I am going to spend doing something that _I want to do_ . Its like watching a movie, or making a sand-castle in the backyard. I won't enjoy it if I keep thinking "Damn, I just watched a movie for 3 hours, there goes $300 worth of time."
NicoJuicy 6y ago
You also need backups and cloud redundancy , if something would happen. You'll need a devops team as soon as you use the cloud ( eg. kubernetes) Those will cost easily more.
blondin 6y ago
i understand what you were trying to say. you are right that people underestimate the work that goes into handling everything themselves.

by api 6y ago

CharlesW 6y ago

"Free as in free puppy" is my other favorite metaphor. Free software is a gift to the word, but IMO it's important not to undervalue the time and expertise of operationalizing it.

thih9 6y ago
It's worth remembering that you can get an expensive puppy too. I.e. choosing proprietary software doesn't mean that time and expertise won't be required. Recent previous discussion at: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26672009 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26672009 .
sigg3 6y ago
Free software was always intended as Libre software or Freedom software, though. The main concern is autonomy, not economic costs. I expect you know this already, which is why the puppy analogy sort of fails.
- CharlesW 6y ago
  Very fair point, since "free puppy" misses the "free as in freedom" aspect. I think it works better than than "free as in beer", which captures part of the CapEx dimension but none of the OpEx dimension.

minitech 6y ago

It’s for people with enough spare time. If you find yourself having to cut your work hours to the tune of $1000/mo (or more realistically, personal time that you value) to self-host some stuff compared to the time it would take to maintain non-self-hosted equivalents, then by all means, don’t – but that’s definitely not how “actual cost” works otherwise. And two hours a month seems high.

slowhand09 6y ago

I would argue yes and no here. If those are two hrs where you are not employed making $100, then its $55. If you have to give up 2 hrs of employed time to maintain this, then yes $255. I love my free time and there is precious little. But I don't think of it as costing ME $100/hr when I wash, dry, and detail my car, especially as I like doing it.

TkTech 6y ago

As a developer, all of the time I spend working on hobby projects (and self-hosting has turned into a hobby) keep me up to date. It's how I learned Kubernetes, it's how I learned Traefik, nginx, and apache before that. It's how I learned how the different packaging and distribution ecosystems work for many different languages and frameworks. I intentionally host and backup some things on AWS, GCloud, and Azure. Other things live on Intel NUCs. I administer a GSuite for the family. The list goes on and on. It gives you the chance to experiment with new tools and toys that you're unlikely to use at your current job. My long-winded point is that all of the things I've picked up have been invaluable to me at work, especially in my time as a contractor where I would be switching between many different stacks. If you want to find a "true" cost for self-hosting, you need to also treat it as training. I don't really believe it's any different from say, a woodworker that has a shop at home. They may spend the workday just doing framing, but odds are good they find the time to make a chair, a bird house, something to keep their skills sharp.

reaperducer 6y ago
As a developer, all of the time I spend working on hobby projects (and self-hosting has turned into a hobby) keep me up to date. True for some things, like things that are not at all related to your work. But your job should be actively trying to make you better at your job, and a better person. Large companies like the one I work for hire outside firms to offer classes to the employees for free, and on company time. If there is a new version of a piece of software that is significantly different from an old one, my company pays for the users to go to training, or to train online. This is very common for products like Office or the Adobe suite. But for some reason, as developers, we too often think that we're supposed to better ourselves on our own dime. If it benefits your current employer, the current employer should chip in.
mattowen_uk 6y ago
I used to think this too, which is why I was self-hosting (I'm the OP of this thread), but as I've got older, and my interests have shifted, along with no longer needing to be at the bleeding edge of my skill-set (I leave that stuff to the younglings these days), I found that managing my own infrastructure felt more like a chore than a hobby, more so if it's a 'production' system and not a 'lab' environment.

shaan7 6y ago

Well that is only if you look at software/ops as a 100% commercial undertaking. It is not. One way to understand why people self-host is to understand why people self-cook their food. It takes significantly longer to prepare food (get raw material, cut, cook) than ordering it. People still do it for $reasons - some find it fun, some find it cheaper, some find it nice to be able to control the taste, some find it more healthy to know whats going on their plate, and so on. Only concentrating on the dollar cost is too narrow a view, IMO.

Chris2048 6y ago
Far fewer people cook their own food for fun versus preparation time not being the only constraint: cost, availability, health, transparency (of prep & ingredients), dependency etc It's common for people to delude themselves into thinking they haven't wasted their time by convincing themselves they did it for fun (or the lols, or whatever) - I'd say the difference is whether they knew )or stated) this upfront, or only after they failed, or had a better solution pointed out to them. 2nd most common also: at least I learnt something / gained xp - which is fair enough, if true. > Only concentrating on the dollar cost is too narrow a view Not if you convey other resources/constraints in dollars. Just attach a dollar-value to your free time, perhaps with discounts for things with side-benefits.
- shaan7 6y ago
  Fair enough, by "far fewer" you basically mean the same thing I meant by "some". The point was not to have an exhaustive list of the exact reasons behind people cooking. > It's common for people to delude themselves into thinking they haven't wasted their time by convincing themselves they did it for fun I am probably missing some context here because this does not make sense to me. Something is fun because its fun, what does it even mean for someone to forcibly convince themselves of something that is otherwise? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > Just attach a dollar-value to your free time I do that when someone asks me to do a project for them in my free time, so I can know what to charge them. But there is little value in assigning a dollar-value for time that I am going to spend doing something that _I want to do_ . Its like watching a movie, or making a sand-castle in the backyard. I won't enjoy it if I keep thinking "Damn, I just watched a movie for 3 hours, there goes $300 worth of time."

NicoJuicy 6y ago

You also need backups and cloud redundancy , if something would happen. You'll need a devops team as soon as you use the cloud ( eg. kubernetes) Those will cost easily more.

blondin 6y ago

i understand what you were trying to say. you are right that people underestimate the work that goes into handling everything themselves.