2 ms·
> Why is the conclusion always to regulate <technology> and not to regulate workplace surveillance for example? Why not both? Both the tool and the activity?
by gspr 6y ago
> Why is the conclusion always to regulate <technology> and not to regulate workplace surveillance for example?
Why not both? Both the tool and the activity?
- marcosdumay 6y agoBecause one is a piece of data that anybody can create and distribute, while the other is a harmful practice that people are fighting for generations.