3 ms·
So RMS thinks "having" child pornography is no harm done to the child, but digitally "having" GPL code in your own proprietary code does harm to the author.
by KingOfCoders 6y ago
So RMS thinks "having" child pornography is no harm done to the child, but digitally "having" GPL code in your own proprietary code does harm to the author.
- torthrowaway998 6y agoI don't believe that I have ever seen RMS using this argument regarding GPL.
- KingOfCoders 6y agoSo I can take GPLed code (make child pornography), relicense it under MIT (copy it to the internet), someone takes it (copy it from the internet), includes it into his own ("have it") and sells it closed source?