2 ms·
I also would be fine as long as "or worse fines will follow" is true. I would consider as desirable that egregious, systematic and catastrophic security failur
by matkoniecz 6y ago
I also would be fine as long as "or worse fines will follow" is true.
I would consider as desirable that egregious, systematic and catastrophic security failures would be resulting in fines and penalties large enough to bankrupt companies[0]. But starting from that is rather not a good idea, I agree that some warning is a good idea.
[0] for example 2000$ for every single leaked address that they deliberately collected (if company is scared: then they should not ask user for address data! Companies very rarely actually need it, and they still ask.).
- zaarn 6y agoFor catastrophic failures the fines certainly become very large very quickly. And follow up fines if behaviour isn't changed do go up as well. So far, it's usually the former as most companies adjust by their first fine.