2 ms·

Sorry, I'm not sure I understand your question? Basically, I use diffing because it's simple. I don't want to mess around with manually updating whatever conte

Sorry, I'm not sure I understand your question? Basically, I use diffing because it's simple. I don't want to mess around with manually updating whatever content I want to update, and I don't want to be forced to generate a specially crafted piece of HTML so that it's updatable. This way I only have to have only one function that updates the current page in-place by diffing, and I can use it everywhere I need to.

jhgb 6y ago
I meant that the old tree and the new tree both originate from the same source (i.e., your code), and if both were annotated with some kind of hashes of their contents, you wouldn't need any diffing to find the changes. You could simply compare the annotations on corresponding pairs of nodes and if they're the same, you don't need to descend any further and compare their contents - you already know than anything below that node is going to be identical. Also, have you compared the performance of whatever you're doing with a simple PJAX-like approach? Considering that browsers are very good at parsing HTML, I wonder how fast that would be compared to doing quite a lot of DOM calls, which you seem to be doing (?). I'd definitely be interested in that comparison.
- kouteiheika 6y ago
  > if both were annotated with some kind of hashes of their contents That's exactly what I don't want to do, since it's extra complexity and extra work on my part. (: > Also, have you compared the performance of whatever you're doing with a simple PJAX-like approach? Considering that browsers are very good at parsing HTML, I wonder how fast that would be compared to doing quite a lot of DOM calls, which you seem to be doing (?). Nope, sorry, I haven't done any benchmarks. From what I've tested the performance is great. If the pages where I use it were heavier then maybe I'd have performance problems, but so far I don't.

jhgb 6y ago

I meant that the old tree and the new tree both originate from the same source (i.e., your code), and if both were annotated with some kind of hashes of their contents, you wouldn't need any diffing to find the changes. You could simply compare the annotations on corresponding pairs of nodes and if they're the same, you don't need to descend any further and compare their contents - you already know than anything below that node is going to be identical. Also, have you compared the performance of whatever you're doing with a simple PJAX-like approach? Considering that browsers are very good at parsing HTML, I wonder how fast that would be compared to doing quite a lot of DOM calls, which you seem to be doing (?). I'd definitely be interested in that comparison.

kouteiheika 6y ago
> if both were annotated with some kind of hashes of their contents That's exactly what I don't want to do, since it's extra complexity and extra work on my part. (: > Also, have you compared the performance of whatever you're doing with a simple PJAX-like approach? Considering that browsers are very good at parsing HTML, I wonder how fast that would be compared to doing quite a lot of DOM calls, which you seem to be doing (?). Nope, sorry, I haven't done any benchmarks. From what I've tested the performance is great. If the pages where I use it were heavier then maybe I'd have performance problems, but so far I don't.