3 ms·
The interesting thing is when machines will write something that feels more human than anything humanity could write. I believe that will happen sooner than pe
by enkid 6y ago
The interesting thing is when machines will write something that feels more human than anything humanity could write. I believe that will happen sooner than people think.
- willhinsa 6y ago> more human than anything humanity could write Made me think of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyO18QrJ3zw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyO18QrJ3zw (White Zombie - More Human Than Human, referencing PKD's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?")
- ahepp 6y agoIsnt that just AGI? I'm not gonna hold my breath.
- TheAceOfHearts 6y agoWe've made huge strides with GPT-3, which has arguably already surpassed at least some percentage of the humans with its writing capabilities.
- hutzlibu 6y agoWhich is maybe not too hard, since quite some percentage of humans still cannot write at all.
- Groxx 6y agoTBH I don't think humans are creative enough in bulk to require AGI to sound human. Individuals checking individuals: yeah, you can detect non-intelligence. But if I told you half of all buzzfeed headlines are machine-written... would you believe it?
- grawprog 6y ago>But if I told you half of all buzzfeed headlines are machine-written... would you believe it? Honestly, yeah. Buzzfeed headlines aren't exactly the most creative or hmmm...deep?...meaningful? There's only so many ways you can write '10 reasons why x does y and that's bad' Or 'Omfg x just happened, better y right now.'
- coldtea 6y ago>Isnt that just AGI? I'm not gonna hold my breath. Or it could just be a fluke random AI achievement. It will still be humans judging it as "more human than anything humanity could write" or not.
- fttx_ 6y agoHuman written headlines are already being optimized in roughly the same way that machines would go about it, and using roughly the same data, too. Marketers have just been training ourselves to think like a statistical model.