4 ms·
Eh, I see this more as a shift in consumer design patterns overall. At the launch of the iphone, everything was skeumorphic. The cover flow clearly emulated fl
by mushufasa 6y ago
Eh, I see this more as a shift in consumer design patterns overall.
At the launch of the iphone, everything was skeumorphic. The cover flow clearly emulated flipping through a stack of records or CD books.
Now that people don't have physical media, the metaphor changes. The new design treats the cover art like an avatar on a forum or social media site -- a small thumbnail to identify the music.
Additionally, the original iPod/iPhone typically used internal storage in your Library. Under the Apple Music era of streaming, this may be a decision to shave a few % off of bandwidth costs by only pushing lower-resolution images. And then the choice being made to not upscale low-res to screen-width and incur blurriness.
- amelius 6y agoMeanwhile lots of folks are going back to vinyl.
- echelon 6y agoThe two don't have to be mutually exclusive. You don't have to hate streaming to enjoy vinyl, and vice versa. I happen to enjoy both and treat them as different experiences. I'm fine if the expectations around digital change as long as it's still accessible.
- crocsarecool 6y agoI do the same thing! I find that with vinyl I’m more likely to listen to the whole album. With streaming, I’ll hear a song I like, remember another song, hop around all over the place.
- rory 6y agoThis was (is?) the idea behind Paper & Plastick Records [0] in the MP3 heyday. The "paper" is a download code, and the "plastick" is a vinyl record along with it. Pretty fun concept IMO. [0] http://www.paperandplastick.com/ http://www.paperandplastick.com/
- barnaclejive 6y agoNot "lots". In terms the entire music consuming industry, "more than previously (which was nearly 0)" at best
- efsavage 6y agoEvery music store I've been in lately has a larger vinyl section than CDs, so as far as physical media goes, it's a pretty big shift.
- plorkyeran 6y agoThat mostly reflects how much CD sales have plummeted.
- cpeterso 6y agoVinyl record sales in 2020 surpassed CDs for the first time since the 1980s: "Vinyl records accounted for $232.1 million of music sales in the first half of the year, compared to CDs, which brought in only $129.9 million. ... Since 2005, sales for vinyl have grown consecutively. In the first half of 2020, vinyl revenue was up 4%, while CD revenue was down 48%, according to the RIAA." https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/13/tech/vinyl-records-cd-sales-riaa/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/13/tech/vinyl-records-cd-sales-r...
- Cthulhu_ 6y agoFor reference, that same article mentions that streaming is a $4.8 billion market, so about 20x the size of the vinyl industry.
- Juliate 6y agoFrom a purely financial point of view, if that's all that matter, yes, you may compare streaming/vinyl/CDs. ... those are _different_ markets: - Streaming is about subscription to a right to listen to music passing by, attached to a specific set of account (with all the metrics that come with it). - Vinyl is about physical analog copies that you can transmit to someone across space and time and that are barely trackable. Edit: but indeed, huge markets crush small ones...
- marvindanig 6y agoBesides, what in the digital realm is not skeuomorphism to begin with? Every single item in the digital world down to a pixel (off of the `pt` points system) we see online is skeuomorphic inspiration off of something! Typesetting and the alphabet is skeuo off the typewriter systems/foundry, buttons––of course skeuomorphism, web-page and scrolling follow from pulp and physical scrolls, header, footer, body inspire off of letterheads. Anyone who claims 'skeuomorphism this, but !skeuomorphism that' is a digital noob and doesn't quite understand where the world has been and how it got here.
- playpause 6y agoThere is a difference between (1) being able to trace design inspiration back to something non-digital, and (2) skeumorphic design. The latter is more about making a nostalgic leap back to a specific pre-digital aesthetic, painstakingly hiding the interim steps. The difference may be subject to nuance and debate, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
- jp555 6y agoOnly if by "lots" you mean "almost no one".
- chrisseaton 6y ago> lots You're deluding yourself.
- Spivak 6y agoVinyl is cool again tho. I’m not “going back” because I never had it in the first place. It’s a collectible piece of art you can listen to!
- austhrow743 6y agohttps://www.riaa.com/u-s-sales-database/ https://www.riaa.com/u-s-sales-database/ Absolute dynamo of a medium.
- j0057 6y agoWow, that page is spectacularly broken on Chrome mobile: it disables zoom so that I can't see the whole graph, and if I view it using 'Desktop version' the page becomes unresponsive due to either too much Javascript, or due to CSS hacking.
- mdoms 6y agoA small number of very noisy folks.
- bluthru 6y ago>The cover flow clearly emulated flipping through a stack of records or CD books. It also cleverly makes albums take up a small amount of space while being identifiable. iPhone Safari tabs are similar.