3 ms·
I don't see how you can promise one buyer 'best effort' and then prioritize another buyer. Could AZ deliver nothing to EU and still claim it was their best effo
by stkdump 6y ago
I don't see how you can promise one buyer 'best effort' and then prioritize another buyer. Could AZ deliver nothing to EU and still claim it was their best effort, just because someone else negotiated something 'better' than best effort?
- nopzor 6y agothere's 'reasonable effort', 'commercially reasonable effort', 'best effort', etc. these are all legal terms that are commonly used, but are still a little vague. my read (and ianal) is that if a company has a hard contractual obligation to fill an order, they need to do that first and then can make a 'best effort' to fill the other orders. best effort is effectively lower priority than an actual contractual obligation.