> This in turn means that the pay that people recieve is worth whatever the working conditions are > people can quit and go find easier job at any time There'

> This in turn means that the pay that people recieve is worth whatever the working conditions are > people can quit and go find easier job at any time There's no basis for this, by your own observation. Offering bottles of water in the desert is not a fair trade of value. You have a hostage negotiation. > There isn't a single shred of credible evidence that this is a widespread problem Except for all the evidence you want to ignore or have laid before you to dismiss. It's tiring at how poorly this rhetoric is thought out. I'll skip to my favorite part. > Unionization is messing with the free market, What does free market mean in this context? Oh right, whatever you think works because it makes sense in a closed system with immediate feedback. Reality does not match this. Major Airlines don't hire less people because they have unions (white collar and blue collar, typically). Most of the post is some strange worldview using open language that has no weight or typical strawman theorycrafting.