4 ms·
I completely agree, but one point that he briefly mentions that I think is even more interesting is the idea of a Facebook IPO. Consider that Facebook isn't go
by hvs 15y ago
I completely agree, but one point that he briefly mentions that I think is even more interesting is the idea of a Facebook IPO.
Consider that Facebook isn't going anywhere (most likely) and will be a major company for a long time. That still doesn't change the fact that if they've already done all of the their major growing (user-wise, I'm assuming that they will continue to look for new revenue sources), their IPO could be a significant letdown for investors if there is simply no where to go but flat.
That said, I don't know any more (or less) that this guy..
- jordan0day 15y agoYeah, at this point why would they IPO (except to get rich[er], of course)? Obviously they could grow in some unforeseen way, but if they don't have an ace up their sleeve, what business reason would they have for needing additional capital?
- rsuttongee 15y agoWell, there may or may not be a pressing business need for capital, but I'm sure a lot of the current shareholders would see an IPO as a good exit. I suppose it's possible that facebook could still be acquired, but given how large they are, and the huge amount of cash/stock it would require to buy them, that seems unlikely to me.
- sixtofour 15y agoToo big to float.
- ralfd 15y agoMajor point for an IPO: SEC regulation requires businesses with more than $10 million in assets and over 499 shareholders to go public.