2 ms·
I suppose this means Discord for Enterprise is never happening, which stinks because it honestly is the most user friendly out of all of these chat applications
by easton 6y ago
I suppose this means Discord for Enterprise is never happening, which stinks because it honestly is the most user friendly out of all of these chat applications with the team-> channel setup. Kind of reminiscent of Basecamp in the project management space, in that respect.
Maybe they’ll take some performance and UX cues and add them to Teams (but I’m saying this about the people who decided to make a greenfield chat/collaboration tool and make the file storage backend SharePoint, so, I suppose I’ll just cry)
- chillfox 6y agoWe used Discord at work for team chat for about a month before upper management found out and dictated that everyone use Teams because it's free as part of Office 365. Discord worked so well for everyone on different platforms and Teams has got so many problems.
- mojo982 6y agoManagement never seems to understand anything besides direct dollars. How much time has it cost the company to switch to Teams? It's definitely not zero.
- easton 6y agoTeams also has an SLA and built in policies for retention, search, and auditing, which Discord does not have because it's a free, consumer service. Which is why I desperately want them to make a enterprise version.
- IshKebab 6y agoI may be in the minority but Discord has a really confusing UI. It's so different to anything else and all the controls are just sort of thrown somewhere (e.g. user preferences). Slack is much much better in that regard (though not perfect).