3 ms·
I wonder how it'll compare with TinEye.
by antihero 15y ago
I wonder how it'll compare with TinEye.
- tropin 15y agoEasy, indepently of how good is, just trying to fight against Google resources will crush TinEye. Today must be a terrible day for them.
- guyzero 15y agoIdee's business model has little to do with TinEye. They're probably not very worried.
- ratzinho87 15y agoThe article said the technology is very similar to Google Goggles. From what I could deduce, Goggles uses some kind of local invariant descriptors (like SIFT or SURF), and TinEye uses some kind of global descriptor (maybe something like this: http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/432-Looks-Like-It.html http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/432-Loo... ). If that is right, Google will be able to retrieve different photos in which the same object appears, whereas TinEye only retrieves the same image, with or without some changes. So, they're quite different beasts. Can't wait to see if I am right...
- pixcavator 15y agoActually, TinEye is pretty good at partial matching.
- krisw 15y agoI compared/contrasted TinEye against Google CBIR for a bunch of images (I use TinEye a lot) and I have to say TinEye looks better than Google CBIR so far. TinEye has less "zero results" and more search results overall, I get the feeling TinEye deals with "Photoshopped images" better somehow.