4 ms·
Compared to what? The general argument for "no raid" is to have a single drive without redundancy other than backup. That's riskier than a mirror.
by rietta 6y ago
Compared to what? The general argument for "no raid" is to have a single drive without redundancy other than backup. That's riskier than a mirror.
- rzzzt 6y ago120 TB drives compared to 4-8-12-ish TB drives. I'm wondering if there is a chance of ever completing operations targeting the entire disk (be it an initial RAID build, resilver, restore or full backup) without hitting a speed bump.
- Dylan16807 6y agoIs that a statistic that matters? If I have a bunch of 8TB drives, I don't care what my odds are of doing a single-drive operation without a speed bump. I'm going to back them all up at the same time, and I only care about speed bumps over the entire operation and how well they're handled.