4 ms·
Technically the spec is part of GraphQL itself now, but an optional recommendation, not something you’re obliged to do. That said, like you I am a fan. It’s a
by andrewingram 6y ago
Technically the spec is part of GraphQL itself now, but an optional recommendation, not something you’re obliged to do.
That said, like you I am a fan.
It’s a pretty defensible pattern, more here for those interested: https://andrewingram.net/posts/demystifying-graphql-connections/ https://andrewingram.net/posts/demystifying-graphql-connecti...
The overall verbosity of a GraphQL queue tends to not be a huge issue either, because in practice individual components are only concerning themselves with small subsets of it (i.e fragments). I’m a firm believer that people will have a better time with GraphQL if they adopt Relay’s bottom-up fragment-oriented pattern, rather than a top-down query-oriented pattern - which you often see in codebases by people who’ve never heard of Relay.
- Aeolun 6y agoAlso by people that have heard of relay but already have an existing codebase. It’s not something that’s very simple to adopt out of hand.