3 ms·
The author uses Pipewire with WebRTC in Chrome, very cool. Pipewire is showing up all over the place. I've been reading a little about it, but I finally got a
by xrd 6y ago
The author uses Pipewire with WebRTC in Chrome, very cool.
Pipewire is showing up all over the place. I've been reading a little about it, but I finally got a comfortable setup of jackd and pulseaudio and am worried it might interfere with my stable setup.
Am I being paranoid?
- bitbang 6y agoI've replaced pulse with pipewire and that has been seamless. The experience is generally determined by how well the distro supports moving from one to the other rather than any maturity issues with pipewire. I've retained jackd instead of using pipewire's implementation because I don't think the pipewire version supports transport control or timecode.
- neolog 6y agoIt's not perfect but mostly works.
- foobar33333 6y agoThe next version of fedora uses pipewire instead of pulse audio. From all the people I have seen test it, they said it works much better than pulse.
- 2OEH8eoCRo0 6y agoI'm testing it now. Fixed my USB audio issues. Much better than pulse.
- solarkraft 6y agoYes. I currently run it besides Pulse for screen sharing and there are no issues. I haven't replaced Pulse yet because it didn't work right away, but plan to try again eventually because Pipewire supports HFP, the less terrible Bluetooth headset profile.
- xrd 6y agoBluetooth support alone would be worthy of the pain of switching. Thank you.