4 ms·
You do have the choice of good old CGNAT, which AFAIK is why IPv6 adoption in China isn’t great despite having 245 IPv4 addresses per 1000 people (granted, a lo
by oefrha 6y ago
You do have the choice of good old CGNAT, which AFAIK is why IPv6 adoption in China isn’t great despite having 245 IPv4 addresses per 1000 people (granted, a lot better than India), and probably a lot more Internet connected devices than India at least for now.
- HarryHirsch 6y agomore Internet connected devices than India You'd think that most everyone in both countries has a cellphone. In rural areas people may not have computers, but every farmer has a cellphone to order stuff from their cooperative or to check prices at market.
- canadianfella 6y agoThis surprised me. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_of_mobile_phones_in_use https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_number_...
- dragonsh 6y ago> more Internet connected devices than India This statement is still true China has far more internet connected devices than India. Although I will say it's a walled Garden, and India with new laws to control Internet related companies is moving towards walled garden. Waiting for a response of the Union Government of India [0] [1] against a high court case in Kerala where the new laws are challenged. If actions like this and promotion of pseudo science continue, India will soon be progressing backwards not forward. [0] https://indianexpress.com/article/india/kerala-hc-notice-to-union-govt-on-plea-challenging-constitutional-validity-of-it-rules-7222511/ https://indianexpress.com/article/india/kerala-hc-notice-to-... [1] https://anonymousfiles.io/hm9MhTpC/ https://anonymousfiles.io/hm9MhTpC/
- blueblisters 6y ago> new laws to control Internet related companies For the sake of being accurate, they're still rules and not laws. Unfortunately, the existing laws leave a lot of discretionary powers in the hand of the executive. But like you mentioned, the rules are being challenged in courts.