3 ms·
I agree that’s not irony, and cities will often have the highest disparity simply by having more people.
by efnx 6y ago
I agree that’s not irony, and cities will often have the highest disparity simply by having more people.
- carmen_sandiego 6y agoTokyo is the biggest city in the world. 10x the population of SF. Not that many homeless addicts lying around, and the average skilled worker doesn't make that much. I can name you 50 cities bigger than SF that don't have this problem. So it seems the correlation between population size and 'rich people literally stepping over needled addicts' is not that strong.
- imtringued 6y agoStepping over needles is considered an acceptable tradeoff in SF. That's where the differences lie.
- carmen_sandiego 6y agoRight, but isn't that exactly the irony, or at least the hypocrisy? That people with the most liberal sensitivities seem willing to accept this level of visible human suffering for whatever personal benefits they get from living there? People will stereotype Texans as rugged individualists ready to shoot you for stealing from a fruit stand, or Chinese as some heartless mass that will run you over and go about their day. But I don't see any cities in those places with such visible social problems. Those drinking the SF Kool-Aid will tell you it's because of the weather being a magnet for homeless people, or some other such nonsense. As if nowhere else in the world keeps temps above freezing year round.