3 ms·
Hmmm...in the real world? Both TFAs answer that question for you: nuclear is safest even including both Fukushima and Chernobyl. Not "safe", because there is
by mpweiher 6y ago
Hmmm...in the real world?
Both TFAs answer that question for you: nuclear is safest even including both Fukushima and Chernobyl. Not "safe", because there is no power generation technology that is 100% safe.
And depending on which data you use, nuclear is even safer than solar and wind.
- 0x1DEADCA0 6y agoThe good news is, if you are right about nuclear being safe, then I will benefit from it. If you are wrong, I will be too busy being dead to remember that I was right!
- mpweiher 6y agoThe "if" here is incorrect: this is not hypothesis, speculation or belief, this is the actual data from the real world.