4 ms·
Something like construct_back would've maybe been a little clearer. I imagine that would have it's own issues as well though.
by xKingfisher 6y ago
Something like construct_back would've maybe been a little clearer. I imagine that would have it's own issues as well though.
- IshKebab 6y agoOr just `place_back`! Why do they have to be so whimsical?
- xKingfisher 6y agoMaybe they're fans of why's guide to Ruby :) Though place_back still has the connotation of 'take this thing and put it over there' that emplace_back is actually the opposite of. Naming things really is hard.