3 ms·
After reading vidarh's comment below ("The biggest challenge with evaluating all of these, is that once you've listened to a comprehensible version of one of th
by mfkp 6y ago
After reading vidarh's comment below ("The biggest challenge with evaluating all of these, is that once you've listened to a comprehensible version of one of these samples, they all sound more intelligible."), I recommend trying to listen to the Lyra version first, then listen to the original next. It actually does sound very strange when you don't have the true audio parsed in your head already. I'm not sure if I would like having to do the extra work to translate this in my head on every conversation.
It's more apparent in the video example from the Google post, I won't spoil it but there's a word that starts with B that sounds very funny in the Lyra version (listen to that one first): https://ai.googleblog.com/2021/02/lyra-new-very-low-bitrate-codec-for.html https://ai.googleblog.com/2021/02/lyra-new-very-low-bitrate-...
- jbluepolarbear 6y agoI did as you said and watched the Lyra version first. I couldn’t understand her and the tone wasn’t matching her lips and mouth. It sounds like someone with a speech impediment is dubbing someone who is not. I wonder how much miscommunication is caused by poor compression and latency.
- IshKebab 6y agoDefinitely a real effect, but Lyra is still clearly an improvement and I assume their MOS testing accounts for that.