4 ms·
Does anyone have insight on what implications follow from Jim Keller's Tenstorrent graph processing chip? He speculates the future may have a $5 add-on chip to
by 6pac3rings 6y ago
Does anyone have insight on what implications follow from Jim Keller's Tenstorrent graph processing chip? He speculates the future may have a $5 add-on chip to a child's toy which will have more intelligence than a human on #162 Lex Fridman Podcast. I get how the single threaded raster pixel gpu architecture is less evolved than a graph processor.
- sitkack 6y agoI saw that, his comment was more around what the future could look like in 20-30 years. I don't think he was talking about their next product. Think Sturgeon and PKD vantage points and timelines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicit_data_graph_execution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicit_data_graph_execution And now I have fallen back down the Epiphany [1] rabbit hole. The main thing that graph processors get you is being able to avoid the von Neumann Bottleneck [2] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapteva https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adapteva [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_architecture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_architecture
- 6pac3rings 6y agoOn the "intellectual bottleneck", perhaps we will see exponential improvement in the next 10 years now that aesthetes in the political realm see the value in a TSMC. The EU has a draft paper out for 2030.