5 ms·
Oh dear. He does look better with hair. I'm sure it's nice to say "No one cares about your hairloss other than you". But I don't think any metric in society
by x86_64Ubuntu 6y ago
Oh dear. He does look better with hair. I'm sure it's nice to say "No one cares about your hairloss other than you". But I don't think any metric in society would back that up.
- CuriouslyC 6y agoBeing bald was good for the careers of The Rock and Bruce Willis, but that only holds if you're not a fit tough guy with the right head shape.
- novok 6y agoThat's the problem with bald, the pretty much the only 'stereotypically attractive' archetype you have is fit muscular action man. The only non-fit celeb I can really think of that might be known as attractive is Patrick Stewart in TNG, and I'm not sure if he was considered attractive vs. more respected role model and leader.
- matwood 6y agoI wouldn't put Willis in the category as particularly muscular. He's usually cast at the every man. What he does is exude man in his on screen confidence.
- novok 6y agoHe is above average in fitness and muscularity, and he is an action hero actor, so it's pretty close!
- lotsofpulp 6y agoI don’t know if Willis would have succeeded today. I can’t think of any similar “every man” casting today. Maybe the new Jurassic Park guy? But I would say he’s much better looking than Willis.
- CuriouslyC 6y agoI know a number of women who made comments about wanting to jump captain Picard's bones back in the day, but I think that was as much about his aura of intelligence and authority as his looks.