4 ms·
I think you're missing the point. The point is that you can get all those properties in Rust without the performance hit. (Except for, well, GC, obviously)
by felipellrocha 6y ago
I think you're missing the point. The point is that you can get all those properties in Rust without the performance hit. (Except for, well, GC, obviously)
- unanswered 6y agoLack of garbage is a pro, not a con.
- jmaygarden 6y agoRust does not build fast. It’s more comparable to C++ if not worse.
- drenvuk 6y agothat depends on your dependencies I believe. If the people who keep including serde into their crates would stop everyone would have faster compile times. Stop using serde. please.
- saagarjha 6y agoDependencies make this much worse, but Rust itself is not really very fast at being compiled.
- Shadonototro 6y agoThe problem with rust is the language is kind of scary to learn, once you get past the learning curve, it is okay i guess And on top of that iteration time is hurt because of both the language, the compiler perf, and the lifetime problems that you need to constantly think about The benefits of using rust on other hand is non-negligible, i wish the team would focus on solving that kind of immediate problems