4 ms·

Are there any plans to support modifying the grammar on the fly or without recompiling?

• maxbrunsfeld 6y ago
  One day, I would love to generalize the web-based playground so that you could edit the grammars. But it's complicated, because we use C as our output language, so you would always need to recompile the C after changing the grammar. So, I would say that it's not on our near-term roadmap.
• dcreager 6y ago
  I don't think you can do this without recompiling, since the grammars get translated into C code before use. But the built-in command line tools (‘tree-sitter parse’, etc) all support a mode where they will detect local changes to a checked-out grammar definition, and recompile on the fly if needed. (This happens each time the CLI program is started up; it doesn't happen during a long-running process.)
  • sitkack 6y ago
    The obvious answer is to embed TCC or another C compiler and either generate a dynamic library or generate wasm and load it directly into the process. exec_wasm(generate_wasm(generate_c(grammar))) Now if you can make that whole fn chain incremental, then a delta_grammar -> delta_c -> delta_wasm -> delta_recomputed_wasm_call stack, this will propagate deltas down to exec_wasm and you could dynamically execute the generated code as the grammar changes.