3 ms·
The WSJ produces just as much good content, and you can subscribe there without inadvertently funding rag hit pieces like this.
by bpodgursky 6y ago
The WSJ produces just as much good content, and you can subscribe there without inadvertently funding rag hit pieces like this.
- mrgordon 6y agoThe WSJ has a ton of dubious articles. The Opinion pieces are garbage compared to the average one in the Times although of course both have misses
- bpodgursky 6y agoThe opinion pieces are contained to the opinion section though. (One) problem with the NYTimes is that that is no longer true.
- ardy42 6y ago> The WSJ has a ton of dubious articles. The Opinion pieces are garbage compared to the average one in the Times although of course both have misses I agree with you on that. I subscribed to both for awhile, but dropped the WSJ because it had less international content, its articles tended to lack background (great if you're following a story closely, not so great if you haven't), and its opinion section was utterly boring and predictable.
- colinmhayes 6y agoIf you don't think the journal has rag hit pieces I don't know what to say other than you obviously haven't read many articles or practically any opinion pieces from them.