2 ms·
Doesn't it look cooler now because it's "retro"? I'm sure the people who were forced to use it for hardware reasons would've loved to have all 24 bits available
by makeworld 6y ago
Doesn't it look cooler now because it's "retro"? I'm sure the people who were forced to use it for hardware reasons would've loved to have all 24 bits available to them.
- yesenadam 6y agoPrimitive/retro looking cool reminds me of Veblen on the "exaltation of the defective": "...the cheap, and therefore indecorous, articles of daily consumption in modern industrial communities are commonly machine products; and the generic feature of the physiognomy of machine-made goods as compared with the hand-wrought article is their greater perfection in workmanship and greater accuracy in the detail execution of the design. Hence it comes about that the visible imperfections of the hand-wrought goods, being honorific, are accounted marks of superiority in point of beauty, or serviceability, or both. Hence has arisen that exaltation of the defective, of which John Ruskin and William Morris were such eager spokesmen in their time; and on this ground their propaganda of crudity and wasted effort has been taken up and carried forward since their time. And hence also the propaganda for a return to handicraft and household industry. So much of the work and speculations of this group of men as fairly comes under the characterisation here given would have been impossible at a time when the visibly more perfect goods were not the cheaper." – Thorstein Veblen, The Theory of the Leisure Class, 1899, p162
- dehrmann 6y agoPosterizing, which I guess is a type of low-bit dithering, or not dithering at all, has been popular of a long time. There's the famous Obama "Hope" poster with him in front of a French flag that was really popular in 2008.
- durakot 6y agoPosterizing is fine but dithering is an art unto itself.