4 ms·
Right. So anyone who thinks that there should be public distributed protocols for exchanging money is a hopeless idealist and just making things worse. So I gu
by ilaksh 6y ago
Right. So anyone who thinks that there should be public distributed protocols for exchanging money is a hopeless idealist and just making things worse.
So I guess in your opinion it would be better if digital transactions just continued to go through monopoly private middlemen.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> So anyone who thinks that there should be public distributed protocols for exchanging money is a hopeless idealist and just making things worse. No, anyone who thinks people should exclusively directly make use of “public distributed protocols” is a hopeless idealist. They aren't “making things worse”, though, except from the perspective of their own hopeless ideal. > So I guess in your opinion it would be better if digital transactions just continued to go through monopoly private middlemen. It can't be both “middlemen” and “monopoly”; it's at worst an oligopoly. And, no, I didn't say that. But more competing low-level payment networks makes middlemen that can abstract them more valuable to most consumers and merchants.