2 ms·
> I should say that a responsive website does not actually mean a website that responds to resizing the browser window It does though, at least indirectly. If
by alpaca128 6y ago
> I should say that a responsive website does not actually mean a website that responds to resizing the browser window
It does though, at least indirectly. If the point is to handle
different screen sizes and resolutions properly that also has
the side effect of handling window resizing; and if one doesn't
work correctly the other will most likely have issues as well in
some situations.
You can pick apart words and meanings as much as you want - a UI
that stops fully functioning after the user makes a valid input
I consider it broken. Hopefully you wouldn't call it "working as
intended" either when a site becomes unscrollable, freezes up or
literally moves sideways out of the browser's viewport when you
type in a text field.
Resizing a window is not a weird edge case, it's been a basic UI
feature for decades, supported even on some smartphones and
tablets, and desktop applications have been able to handle it
fine.
- mouzogu 6y agoNo what you are talking about is called fluid design not responsive. So whether a website responds fluidly to browser resizing is a design decision and not indicative of something being broken. This is such a common and frustrating misconception.
- alpaca128 6y agoSure, you can call not supporting one of the most basic UI features a "design decision", but it's a terrible decision and it won't protect you against valid complaints from users, just like apps like Skype got complaints for mishandling the window's close button. Intentionally broken is still broken.