5 ms·

They even talk about their own inappropriate behaviour in this statement: >2021-02-06 12:00 @DuckSoft sended a pull request that adds the PoC to Signal TLS pro

by FDSGSG 6y ago

They even talk about their own inappropriate behaviour in this statement: >2021-02-06 12:00 @DuckSoft sended a pull request that adds the PoC to Signal TLS proxy's repository. It has since been deleted and both @DuckSoft and @studentmain were banned by the Signal organization on GitHub in the afternoon. A repost by @U-v-U was later closed and locked.

h_anna_h 6y ago
I do not see any evidence of this in said quote.
- FDSGSG 6y ago
  You don't see why making such a pull request would be inappropriate? Do you understand what pull requests are for? Does this look like an attempt at productive contribution to you? https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/pull/15 https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/pull/15 Is this a good patch? It just drops a random file into the repo. https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/commit/40f4d9d7a18611ce68a8f6400007dcaf263b189b.patch https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/commit/40f4d9d... These people decided to abuse the pull request system after being asked to use https://community.signalusers.org/ https://community.signalusers.org/ instead of GH issues to discuss their concerns.
  - h_anna_h 6y ago
    This has nothing to do with my post.
    - FDSGSG 6y ago
      Of course it does, unless you were replying to the wrong comment in the first place. What was it you did not see any evidence of?
      - h_anna_h 6y ago
        I think that it was you who replied to the wrong comment. I did not see any evidence of them talking about any inappropriate behavior of their own nor did I see them saying anything inappropriate in the quote that you posted.
        ryanlol 6y ago
        You have to be pretty thick if you can’t understand how those pull requests were inappropriate.
        h_anna_h 6y ago
        You have to be pretty thick if you can’t understand what my post was about.
        FDSGSG 6y ago
        You have a weird definition of "inappropriate".
- ryanlol 6y ago
  >2021-02-06 12:00 @DuckSoft sended a pull request that adds the PoC to Signal TLS proxy's repository. This is inappropriate. Pulling in a random PoC to the repo is not how you’re supposed to use PRs. Issues exist for this purpose, but theirs had already been removed. >It has since been deleted [...] A repost by @U-v-U was later closed and locked. Reposting the inappropriate PR is also inappropriate.
  - h_anna_h 6y ago
    I do not find either of these to be inappropriate.
    - ryanlol 6y ago
      How is reposting content that was previously removed by maintainers not inappropriate? Signal made it very clear that this stuff should be posted on their community forums, not github.
    - proactivesvcs 6y ago
      They are, along with all of the misbehaviour this group is perpetrating. Acting in this way well result in nothing but derision and bans from any organisation (and prospective employer, for that matter) because it is childish and unproductive.

by FDSGSG 6y ago

h_anna_h 6y ago

I do not see any evidence of this in said quote.

FDSGSG 6y ago
You don't see why making such a pull request would be inappropriate? Do you understand what pull requests are for? Does this look like an attempt at productive contribution to you? https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/pull/15 https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/pull/15 Is this a good patch? It just drops a random file into the repo. https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/commit/40f4d9d7a18611ce68a8f6400007dcaf263b189b.patch https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-TLS-Proxy/commit/40f4d9d... These people decided to abuse the pull request system after being asked to use https://community.signalusers.org/ https://community.signalusers.org/ instead of GH issues to discuss their concerns.
- h_anna_h 6y ago
  This has nothing to do with my post.
  - FDSGSG 6y ago
    Of course it does, unless you were replying to the wrong comment in the first place. What was it you did not see any evidence of?
    - h_anna_h 6y ago
      I think that it was you who replied to the wrong comment. I did not see any evidence of them talking about any inappropriate behavior of their own nor did I see them saying anything inappropriate in the quote that you posted.
      - ryanlol 6y ago
        You have to be pretty thick if you can’t understand how those pull requests were inappropriate.
        h_anna_h 6y ago
        You have to be pretty thick if you can’t understand what my post was about.
      - FDSGSG 6y ago
        You have a weird definition of "inappropriate".
ryanlol 6y ago
>2021-02-06 12:00 @DuckSoft sended a pull request that adds the PoC to Signal TLS proxy's repository. This is inappropriate. Pulling in a random PoC to the repo is not how you’re supposed to use PRs. Issues exist for this purpose, but theirs had already been removed. >It has since been deleted [...] A repost by @U-v-U was later closed and locked. Reposting the inappropriate PR is also inappropriate.
- h_anna_h 6y ago
  I do not find either of these to be inappropriate.
  - ryanlol 6y ago
    How is reposting content that was previously removed by maintainers not inappropriate? Signal made it very clear that this stuff should be posted on their community forums, not github.
  - proactivesvcs 6y ago
    They are, along with all of the misbehaviour this group is perpetrating. Acting in this way well result in nothing but derision and bans from any organisation (and prospective employer, for that matter) because it is childish and unproductive.