13 ms·
Reddit is an intentionally designed dopamine machine with some areas of usefulness. There are pockets of great, high signal communities on Reddit that have not
by rkho 6y ago
Reddit is an intentionally designed dopamine machine with some areas of usefulness. There are pockets of great, high signal communities on Reddit that have not been unbundled. Discovery, however, is a mess.
Some examples of some great subs:
- HomeImprorvement is great for repair advice
- Keto was helpful in my weight loss journey
- Posture for, well, fixing my posture
I've also bought and sold various digital and physical goods through HardwareSwap, GameSale, SteamGameSwap, and others. One of Reddit's strengths is being able to tie a username to a post history across many interests, which has given me enough confidence signals in buying and selling things on there. I'm sure fraud happens, but I have personally not (yet) been affected by it when transacting on the platform.
But the main, core "Reddit experience" as algorithmically produced by r/Popular is a complete dumpster fire. It's the noise of the entire internet, jam packed into a webpage. So many low quality posts and comments that encapsulate all the negatives about "internet culture". There's no room for thoughtful discussion and discourse on the majority of the site, just shitposting and low rung commentary.
Because of that, having a productive/net positive Reddit experience comes with a high barrier to entry in knowing which communities to pay attention to and which time sinks to avoid.
- comboy 6y agoReddit is a company that made people moderate their content for free. You don't need to know sub names to get some use of it. I append "reddit" to probably 1/3 of my search engine queries. Especially useful when looking for product recommendations.
- n42 6y agounfortunately, I have found this increasingly less useful as marketers catch on.
- mtgentry 6y agoI’ve wondered about this. Can you tell when it’s a marketer?
- ObsoleteNerd 6y agoPerfect example I found the other day... the main post is clearly a bot, and all the replies are bots pretending to be users too. Reddit USED to be amazing for finding recommendations for products/services but these days it’s just another bot-filled and paid-content dumping ground like the Google search results. https://www.reddit.com/user/amily95/comments/fkm1rn/how_to_convert_spotify_music_songs_to_mp3_for/ https://www.reddit.com/user/amily95/comments/fkm1rn/how_to_c...
- JohnJamesRambo 6y agoUncanny valley all the way down.
- bentcorner 6y agoSometimes it's obvious - the same user posting/commenting the same link across many related subs with very low signal and no other posting or commenting activity. Or you see the same link and comment/post text posted by many different users. But this is just low-effort marketing. There's a lot of content that is relevant but also marketing. Burger/chicken restaurant twitter account screenshots getting posted to a default sub, for example.
- n42 6y agoas others said, it can be obvious if one account is used to share the same sentiment. one other obvious one I've seen is when batches of similar posts for recommendations in category "X" have each received a reply, usually days/weeks after the original submission, all from different users, posted around the same time, recommending the same product
- fireattack 6y ago>looking for product recommendations This is the trick I use too; but I found the result still isn't great enough for a few reasons. 1. People seem have a tendency to recommend products/brands that are niche or "in minority". Like some obscure ones that scratch particular itch for that user (and often expensive and hard to find). This is totally fine on its own, but you want to have the big picture (i.e. learn about the most popular ones) first when researching a new product. 2. The number of the answers is often so low (and most would have 1 digit upvotes) that it's very hard to judge when there is conflicting info. 3. People often just list the brand/name, without much more information. 4. you can't even sure if these answers are genuine (instead of marketing/soft advertisement). Still, probably much better than anything else that can be easily found in general search.
- hctaw 6y agoOne upvote on Reddit is worth 1,000 5 star reviews, for now at least.
- toomanybeersies 6y agoI've found that reddit tends to get pretty cargo culty around particular products/brands, like Sony mirrorless and the Olympus mju II for cameras, Denon DJ equipment, or Starting Strength for weightlifting. So many recommendations basically follow the form "I'm new to this hobby and bought one of these a week ago, I swear it's the best thing ever"
- chaps 6y agoIs this post meant for SEO?
- sidibe 6y agoIn any kind of subreddit about a category of products, they are all very sure that anything that's not expensive is awful. But what would real customers be doing replying to posts I'm a subreddit like that? Probably not a great place to compare things
- emptyfile 6y ago
- juped 6y agoThis just works because Google is at a more advanced stage of decay into content farm dystopia than Reddit is.
- ZephyrBlu 6y agoTrue. I never want to look at articles directly from google because they're always full of bullshit with a low ratio of signal to noise.
- lmm 6y agoMaybe. But content on reddit has better provenance data than content on the web in general; reddit has found a version of identity that strikes the right balance. You can take an arbitrary comment and be able to tell with reasonable confidence whether there's an at least somewhat "real" user behind it, in a way that you just can't for a random blog or a product review anywhere else.
- rangibaby 6y agoThat's what the marketers want you to think
- 411111111111111 6y agoyour phrasing makes it sound like a conspiracy, but its really not. Going on various social media platforms to decide on a purchase has already been an established pattern for more then 10 years. That's more then enough time for even the biggest corporations to act on. Do keep in mind that the influencing agency doesn't actually have to write comments. Machine Learning is super good in determining if a given comment is about [topic], and wherever its a [positive] or [negative] comment. I'm sure people already know that there are a lot of agencies around which sell you votes on relevant platforms, so any given company can - for peanuts(!) - just upvote positive 'real' comments and downvote the same for the competitors products etc. There is very little you can 'trust' on the internet, as its just too profitable to spread propaganda through it. there have been several people that publicly admitted that their whole job was to derail critical conversations on various platforms. So even if you put in time and produce a quality comment... there are people who get paid just to write comments to make it look like misinformation.
- betwixthewires 6y agoMy favorite reddit search result story: I asked a question once on Reddit, got no answer, figured it out on my own, then added my solution to the thread because I've been saved countless times by the guy that does that on the internet and I wanted to pay it forward. A couple years later, I have the same problem and remember solving it but don't remember how, search it and find my own answer. This distils down basically every quality of reddit you need to know.
- the-dude 6y agoI have more or less the same story, but then about DejaNews.
- sideshowb 6y agoI did exactly that on stackoverflow
- xwdv 6y agoThis must be what time travel feels like.
- koheripbal 6y agoUnless it's a non-tech issue, I'd recommend Stack Exchange for those types of things. The issue with Reddit is that they lock all threads over a year old which makes them a poor mechanism to keep updated answers to questions.
- maxerickson 6y agoLocking it in a year is better than locking it right away.
- TheRealDunkirk 6y agoI append "-site:reddit.com" to my programming queries, if it's coming up in results, because it takes multiple clicks in their slow, user-hostile web application to expand the conversation, and there's NEVER an answer there.
- romanows 6y agoThat's the new, terrible interface. Replace the "www" with "old" in the URL, like "old.reddit.com". If you create an account, you can configure "old reddit" to be your default. There are also browser add-ons that will rewrite the URLs automatically. The difference is night and day.
- TheRealDunkirk 6y agoWell, like I said, there's NEVER an answer there, so there's no reason to rewrite the URL, or create an account to make it the default. Given the engineering effort to write the "new" site in such a user-hostile way, the refusal to backpedal on it in the face of overwhelming public negativity, and similar malfeasance on the mobile version, I have a hard time believing that they will keep the "old" version around for much longer.
- ehnto 6y agoYet they totally borked the discovery experience through search. Now you search, click a reddit link, it takes you to half a page with two comments and you have to click a new link to see the whole thing, that is after fighting away the Install the App prompt of course.
- mancerayder 6y agoThis. When I'm looking for a product rec or review, looking up an experience doing something or even a health symptom, and many other things, the first attempt with Google is a dismal failure.. Does Google think we are so stupid that we don't see that paid garbage has replaced data in search results? So reddit is added as a keyword. How soon before the user generated content is fully under centralized control so they can go back to force-feeding in search?
- TechnoTimeStop 6y agoAnd fake shills from all over the globe able to target communities with a microscope of oppression? It is total insanity that the digital citizen doesn't have rights to know who is not a verified person and who could be one of million bot accounts.
- wwadvisory 6y ago>It is total insanity that the digital citizen doesn't have rights to know who is not a verified person I would gladly trade having to manually filter through the crap for anonymity online. I think there's absolutely a niche for platforms serving (only?) verified people, but I don't think that should be the default in the way that saying it's a right for digital citizens to know implies.
- efrank02 6y agoI’ve never spent time on r popular or the main page. If you only spend time in subs Reddit is very well designed and I think less exploitative than other social media
- frakkingcylons 6y agoMy issue is that you can’t serendipitously stumble upon random interesting subreddits without using the front page.
- omegabravo 6y agorecommendations work well, but that's practically the only method.
- hobofan 6y ago> serendipitously You could subscribe to /r/Serendipity which posts a few posts from random subs a day.
- howenterprisey 6y agoI browsed that just now. It was very... Reddit. I don't know why I was hoping for some nice, small subs on topics I'm interested in.
- patrickk 6y agoSearch a topic through multireddit and you’ll often find users collection of related subreddits on a given topic, e.g. DIY https://old.reddit.com/user/patrick_k/m/diy/ https://old.reddit.com/user/patrick_k/m/diy/
- DoingIsLearning 6y agoIt's a great feeling when you find out something new that you really like! I did not know this was a feature and it is pretty damn cool!
- jug 6y agoYes, discoverability of "good" subreddits is not there. But on the other hand I think Reddit get too much criticism. I find most subreddits besides the big catch-all ones like /r/pics good. Basically all the TV shows have fun post-episode discussions and going through Game of Thrones, Black Sails or The Expanse wouldn't have been the same without Reddit for me. It becomes the group of buddies I can vent or be in awe with, when they don't share my TV show preferences at home. Formula1 is a must for an F1 fan. Wow, I've learnt so much and the community is now part of watching F1. Pre-race chats, post-race, pre-qualification, post-qualification, haha... The behind the scenes racing drama... MechanicalKeyboards can look over the top and elitist at first sight, until you realize they have self-distance and generally pretty relaxed (and it's very inspiring, dangerously so for my pocket...)
- kart23 6y agor/formuladank for the more...edgy f1 content! Good subs exist like you said. But even with f1, the same opinions start get upvoted, and that ends up just being noise for me. There's a definitely a sweet spot in terms of size and moderation.
- throwaway0a5e 6y agoThe joke subs are always better on average because they are fundamentally rooted in BS so you don't have people rabidly agreeing with whatever the common trope is to show how much they fit in.
- shafyy 6y agoI also love the TV show subs. And each of them has its own culture, too. For example, r/thesopranos is basically just a bunch of people discussing the series with quotes from The Sopranos. Makes me laugh out loud every time I read something on there.
- ZephyrBlu 6y ago/r/formula1 has useful info, but it feels very cliquey and fanboyish.
- gogopuppygogo 6y agoNot to mention the barrier of getting past the /r/popular posts rises when you use the new design or mobile app. The breath of fresh air that is old.Reddit.com won’t last much longer I’m afraid.
- wtf_is_up 6y agoI've been a frequent reddit user for 10 years. I don't know if I can continue if they deprecate old.reddit.com and i.reddit.com. The new version is just so bad it's astounding.
- hansel_der 6y agosame same. can't help but wonder what the goal of the redesign was...
- MagnumOpus 6y agoThe goal is explicitly to make the web experience especially on mobile so bad that people are driven to install the app. Apparently an installed app drives engagement and can be monetized better (circumventing adblockers etc).
- system16 6y agoI've been a reddit user for over a decade and for the last few years mainly use it with the Apollo reddit client on iOS, or the rare times I log in to old.reddit. I recently searched for discussion on a topic and ended up at the "new" web design while not logged in and was blown away by how user hostile it is. Ads disguised as content, promoted posts, gating comments through multiple hoops, unnecessary thread reloads... basically enough dark patterns to make Pinterest blush.
- NoPicklez 6y agoCould you not argue that HN is the same thing, just at a smaller scale? HN is essentially just a front page. Reddit just doesn't tailor itself to one particular type of discussion like HN does. But rather the dominant topics of discussion such as /r/funny frequently dominate the front page due to popularity. Reddit is really what you make of it and if you only subscribe to topics that interest you, it becomes a vastly different experience than what a default account would be subjected to.
- edgyquant 6y agoThe minimum karma requirements to downvote goes a long way on HN. I’d say they should add a limit to upvote as well, but that might make things worse idk.
- brailsafe 6y agoIt would curb how easy it is to manufacture a popular post
- bad_username 6y agoIn terms of features and intent HN is similar to Reddit. But HN is miles and miles ahead in the quality of discussion, moderation, and diversity of thought and opinions.
- buzzerbetrayed 6y agoWhen compared to all of Reddit, sure. But not necessarily when compared to a high quality subreddit. And that is what you should be comparing HN to. HN is essentially a subreddit on a different domain.
- collyw 6y agoI would disagree on some of those. The quality of discussion is higher provided you don't mind the lack of humour. And the diversity of thoughts and opinions isn't that high because of the strict moderation. If you want true diversity of opinion, but far lower quality of discussion, 4chan is the place.
- somedude895 6y agoDon't forget r/askhistorians One of the most well-moderated communities out there with clear and stringently enforced rules that cares about one topic only and allows no soap boxing, low quality comments or toxicity.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- heterodyning 6y agoI wish there was an archive of r/askhistorians. It looks like they nuke discussion after they get one decent sized answer. I cant seem to find older threads too.
- aurbano 6y agoOh the irony!
- ricree 6y agoThe closest thing to an archive are the weekly "Sunday Digest" posts, in which people nominate their favorite answers of the week. It's eclectic and scattershot when it comes to topic, but the answers themselves are often interesting and well constructed.
- heterodyning 6y agoYes but it is very frustrating they have not indexed old answers that are impossible to reach beyond a few months.
- goto11 6y agoThey continuously nuke answers and comments which does not conform to their standards, regardless of whether there is a legitimate answer or not. This is why so many threads appear empty, with only "[deleted]" answers.
- 6y ago
- hertzrat 6y agoI used to search around for various forums to post in or find answers in. Over the years, the little forums vanished and all that’s left is Reddit and a few holdouts. The only real advantage of the Reddit model is that you don’t have to read 5 pages of flame war and off topic “how is your cat these days?” to find a good comment. If the average web forum sorted posts by upvotes instead of chronologically by default (while letting a user choose their preference), I think small forums would still be a lot more common - Eg, hn, stack overflow, etc
- Applejinx 6y agoUpvotes are dangerous (downvotes even more so): that's how your bots and troll farms control discourse. I guess it's like a sort of Faustian bargain, in order to present anything in a more curated fashion you make available the opportunity to abuse that mechanism.
- wtf_is_up 6y agoThere's a sweetspot where the sub is big enough that there's activity and content of interest but not so big that it just turns into a mess of low effort upvote farming. There's also a few different sub archetypes that have formed. For instance /r/nfl is a low effort upvote farm due to its size, but the moderators do a fantastic job of policing submissions. So if you use it as a news aggregator, it's great. Just don't read any of the discussion.
- NathanielK 6y agoSmaller subreddits are beings dead is partially due to reddit's Hot ranking algorithmn. It is designed to have fresh posts up top on the daily [1]. Unless you switch to an alternate rating scheme (monthly top is helpful), any subreddit without hundreds of posts per week is basically dead. Large subreddits with thousands of weekly posts have the opposite problem, where low effort posts will dominate the top if unmoderated. [1] https://medium.com/hacking-and-gonzo/how-reddit-ranking-algorithms-work-ef111e33d0d9 https://medium.com/hacking-and-gonzo/how-reddit-ranking-algo...
- tluyben2 6y agoI only read my favorite subreddits; never the mean 'stream' (/r/Popular etc) as it's horrible (imho). I have little feeling for that dopamine thing people have with these streams (inc instagram, facebook, etc) ; they only annoy me so I never check them. Not sure what chemical they cause for me but selfies, very bad (elevator) muzak and people either whining or lying about their lives is not working for me in any way, even (or especially?) if I know these people.
- webscout 6y agoAs for r/Popular alternatives, I usually stick to less-noisy sites like https://upstract.com https://upstract.com / Metafilter.com or even Pinboard's popular section.
- leokennis 6y agoI would say that Reddit is an intentionally designed dopamine machine with *many* areas of usefulness. Most of Reddit is pretty great. One example, /r/formula1 is the huge engaged community that every sport wishes it had. Live race threads are as close to watching the race with a bunch of friends in the room as it gets. Same goes for most interests: the biggest community about it is probably on Reddit, and most likely the majority of the content on its sub is pretty high quality. I do agree it can be a chore to find these communities. Especially when their name is only tangentially related to their thing (small example, the subreddit of the 90's show "Friends" is /r/howyoudoin). Reddit definitely needs to have some way to "tag" subreddits, and search on those tags. Finally, indeed the default Reddit experience is a sort of clickbait dopamine machine of /r/pics, /r/funny, /r/me_irl etc. One the one hand this sucks, on the other hand, it keeps the casual low effort lurker out of your high quality subreddits.
- 29athrowaway 6y agor/zerowaste is a great sub too. It's about reducing your waste output. Some bizarre subreddits I read once in a while are: - r/CatsStandingUp: the rule #1 states "Cat. and only Cat.", and the community interpreted it as only being able to write "Cat."... So, every post and every comment says "Cat.". - r/IMGXXXX: random videos with default names given by cameras (e.g.: DSCXXXX, IMGXXXX)
- throwaway0a5e 6y ago>HomeImprorvement is great for repair advice You mean /r/YouCantDoItCallAPro The advice and professional subs Reddit devolve into content of "I barely know anything about this field but I can google it as needed" quality. The broader the field and the lower the barrier to "sounding like you know what you're talking about" (home improvement, personal finance, legal advice come to mind) the more this is true. There are some really small niches where this isn't yet true but they are few and far between. Whatever subject you are intimately familiar with go look on that sub and you will see a lot of low quality crap, worthless tropes held up as gospel, lack of nuance and opinions generally below even what novices in the field put out being held in high regard. Now realize that every subject is like this. (related: Murray, Gell, Mann amnesia effect) For all of it's faults, at least 4Chan hit you with a "everything here is bullshit and you're a fool to believe otherwise" (or something along those lines) on their home page >Keto was helpful in my weight loss journey >Posture for, well, fixing my posture If /r/Keto fixed your diet and /r/Posture fixed your posture it wasn't advice you needed. You could have learned the same things reading a couple low quality wikihow articles. What you needed was psychological, a perception that the group believed those things, a way to legitimize the advice or some other veneer of legitimacy. I don't want to speculate what's going on in your head but Reddit advice is fundamentally mass market low quality drivel. Now, the world is full of small problems and the average guy doesn't need an NFL dietician to help him lose weight or a boiler engineer to design his guest bathroom plumbing, the service industry practically runs on $20 Walmart no-slip shoes, etc. etc. so mass market low quality solutions do work for a lot of people and lots of use cases (hence why they're mass market). But my point is that it's folly to put Reddit advice on a pedestal like it's good for the same reason you shouldn't look for quality philosophical debate in the youtube comments of amateur political analysts.
- bluedino 6y agoIf wikihow articles fixed your diet and posture it wasn't advice you needed. You could have learned the same things reading a couple low quality reddit posts.
- desmap 6y ago> Reddit is an intentionally designed dopamine IDK, yes dopamine gets triggered but much less than with the typical suspects out there. I find many of reddit subs quite helpful tbh, you check them out, comment, upvote, submit and leave again. It's just bothering that one company could monopolize the entire forum space. They did a good job but yeah, one company to rule them all isn't good.
- Applejinx 6y agoReddit's the one social media place I retained after deleting Twitter and Facebook, and I'm now asking why. I think it's because it reminds me of Usenet. It's writing text posts, and typically not getting much of a reaction, and possibly some sort of direct message: a limited ability to track what I've put out there, how it went over, who responded. There's a sort of vague resistance to certain nasty brigading and abusing tactics that would otherwise really control the place, and there's a huge proliferation of little private interests right down to stuff that's by definition not controlled: if a little teeny sub is just dead it's almost definitely authentic, and not of interest to players who'd want to manipulate discourse. Everything that's bigger and more effective at really bringing all the little meaningless folks into the discourse, is prey for propaganda use. It's the stuff like old Usenet, where there are places that are NOT IMPORTANT, which is capable of being authentic and to some extent 'real'. I guess it's a sliding scale between that and Twitter and Facebook.
- nicbou 6y agoI used to moderate /r/berlin, and it's a little bit like my internet pub. I recognise some of the users, and some of them recognise me. /r/popular is more like the random junk bins at Aldi. Most of it is trash, but somehow you're always tempted to have a look at it.
- khawkins 6y ago>But the main, core "Reddit experience" as algorithmically produced by r/Popular is a complete dumpster fire. It's the noise of the entire internet, jam packed into a webpage. So many low quality posts and comments that encapsulate all the negatives about "internet culture". There's no room for thoughtful discussion and discourse on the majority of the site, just shitposting and low rung commentary. Just jumped onto the front page and found most of the posts to be politically charged, including posts from ostensibly apolitical subs like /r/science. Of course there's a market there, but they're certainly not going to grow when they're immediately alienating such a wide potential user base. Reddit generally works for these small subs, but even those will eventually become cancerous. I don't know if it's something reddit can fix, outside of adult hobby-oriented subs, nearly every community went from something of quality to worthless after a few years.
- Applejinx 6y agoOf course. People here automatically think 'corporations and products' when they think of marketing, but it's WAY more interesting to doctor and manipulate the literal state of the world through political propaganda, and there's a number of actors including some real big ones putting huge effort into exactly this. Marketing cameras and boner pills pales in comparison to what can be done if you're trying to get your enemy's citizens to literally murder each other in the streets and get your geopolitical rival to fall over dead. The power of essentially mass marketing through brigading, seeding propaganda, and controlling the discourse is enormous. That's what you're seeing: this new form of warfare, and the aftereffects of it as ordinary Redditors react to what's being put out there. Selling products just isn't as important.
- honkdaddy 6y ago/r/science is particularly insane these days. The majority of the front page is often dominated by posts from one user, /u/mvea. Mvea is a mod and a power user with 28m karma amassed over the years. Mvea has some pretty strong political opinions. A good chunk of the "republican=bad"-finding studies on /r/science are posted by him, as are a good chunk of the "cannabis/psychadelics=good"-finding studies. Checking out his user page today, 6 of his last 10 posts are related to Trump, conservatives, or psychoactive drugs. If you point this out, you get banned. If you link to /u/mvea's page, you get banned. If you comment anything that's not another peer reviewed journal, including any kind of anecdote or hypothetical, your comment is deleted and you're given a "warning". I do think the rules were originally put in place with good intentions, but like many subreddits with strict rules, draconian mods end up taking it a bit too seriously and it entirely drives away the laymen.
- Abishek_Muthian 6y agoSocial media platforms were never built for constructive debates, Social currencies incentivizes majoritarian opinions. If you hold a minority view and want it to be acknowledged then moving on to a platform where your view is the majoritarian opinion is the only option, Reddit facilitates it with its Subreddits. Love Elon Musk? go to r/elonmusk Hate Elon Musk? go to r/EnoughMuskSpam Other social media have groups, forums and what not; Yet each subreddit is a platform by itself, tightly knit community, privileges & tools for moderation. Mobile app has enabled those who are from other social media platforms, those who would have never used old.reddit.com to try it out, accelerated by recent string of high profile news involving reddit. It would be interesting to watch how reddit balances its philosophy with advertiser's interests.
- encom 6y ago>Reddit facilitates it with its Subreddits That's only partially true. Your views and opinions must still be vetted by the admins, or you and/or your subreddit will be banned.
- selykg 6y agor/AskHistorians - Just what it says, but it is probably one of the best subs on the entire platform in my opinion. And I'm not even a history buff of any kind. It's just super well moderated and has clear rules that get to the heart of the purpose of the sub. r/fantasy - I read a lot of fantasy novels. This is probably my most visited sub on all of reddit. It's great. They get a lot of fantasy authors to participate and just generally have good discussions. That said, I feel they may be having some growing pains lately as I've found a whole lot of combative discussion lately on some of the more popular authors (like Brandon Sanderson), where someone says they love that author in one post, then almost within the same day a hate post comes up that tries to counter the positive post. It's.... annoying and I sure hope the mods can figure out a good method for stopping this shit as it's super obnoxious. (People, you're free to your opinions, you don't have to tell the world if your opinion is different than someone else's. It's not a zero sum game.) There's a lot of really good subs out there, some more useful than others, some run by idiots, some have far more effort put into them than there should be. Edit; formatting, spelling
- doc_gunthrop 6y agoAskHistorians really is a great subreddit. IMO it's great because the moderators are so diligent with keeping it free from garbage (ie. memes, puns, unsubstantiated opinions, etc.).
- throwaway894345 6y agoI agree about the core experience and the recommendations. I am often recommended stuff from r/news and r/politics and the topics appear interesting, but the comments are invariably shitposts. The discourse aligns superficially with my politics, but if I was so insecure in my beliefs that I needed to surround myself with a group of people who incessantly dragged caricatures of my political opponents, I’d log onto Twitter.
- Drip33 6y agoAnother example of a great sub: /r/kidneystones sad face noises
- phjesusthatguy3 6y agoReddit appified USENET.
- goto11 6y ago> intentionally designed dopamine machine Sounds nefarious, but can't you say the same thing about say music?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- e40 6y agoThat's https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeImprovement/ https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeImprovement/ (you misspelled it)