3 ms·
My understanding is that (some) law enforcement agencies have been more than happy to drop cases rather than subject investigative tools to proper scrutiny[0].
by ahepp 6y ago
My understanding is that (some) law enforcement agencies have been more than happy to drop cases rather than subject investigative tools to proper scrutiny[0]. They have no qualms resorting to "parallel construction"[1], and simply using the inadmissible (sometimes illegal) evidence to find admissible evidence.
[0] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/04/fbi-would-rather-prosecutors-drop-cases-than-disclose-stingray-details/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/04/fbi-would-rather...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction
- canadianfella 6y agoYou seem to imply there is a problem with parallel construction.
- nickodell 6y agoStingrays are more useful as an investigative tool than an evidentiary tool. DNA is the other way around.