4 ms·
I see your point but there is nothing to stop organisations maintaining their own set of "trusted builders". `FROM node` etc is still relying on external commu
by ojhughes 6y ago
I see your point but there is nothing to stop organisations maintaining their own set of "trusted builders".
`FROM node` etc is still relying on external communities, the buck has to stop somewhere
- kkapelon 6y agoYou can actually do from a private Docker image that YOU have created and going upwards you only hit from "scratch" so in that case there are no external communities involved. I am not saying that people should do this in practice, but it is certainly possible.
- samhuk 6y agoI certainly agree with you there, but I was going off the article, which gave off a strong viewpoint of "Oh, you don't actually make these builders though, are you nuts?" Any kind of technology like this tends to stick out when pitching software to financial industries, who like technologies that don't have many levels of abstraction (which to them, minimizes where they get to place accountability and the surface area for issues). Regardless, you have a point and what you say is true. But "truth" and "financially compliant", are not terms to be mixed.