5 ms·

How many technologists on this site are responsible for the death of RSS. Shame on you people.

• thaumasiotes 6y ago
  What death? RSS is as alive as ever.
  • Acrobatic_Road 6y ago
    Twitter removed RSS in 2013. Facebook removed it too. Youtube didn't remove it, but you have to go into the page source to find the feed link.
    • jjulius 6y ago
      Three sites out of thousands upon thousands that still use it hardly seems like it would be worth calling it "dead".
      • pwdisswordfish0 6y ago
        "Three sites out of thousands" is disingenuous. Twitter alone is enough to make the difference. For "RSS is as alive as ever" to be true, it would follow that you'd expect to find as many people publishing their content via RSS as the case before. They're not. There are many, many, many derelict blogs, all effectively abandoned because their authors migrated to Twitter, intentionally/consciously or not.
        • maximente 6y ago
          fairly strong claims from someone who had no trouble calling someone else's disingenuous. care to share the data so that we can see what you have seen, ostensibly related to blog atrophy over time? should be fairly easy to spot when twitter cropped up if, as you've claimed, "they're not [publishing their content via RSS as the case before.]" or, it could be - just floating this - that lots of blogs are posting on RSS, /and/ twitter has gotten a lot more traffic from previous RSS users.
          • pwdisswordfish0 6y ago
            Although you might be, I'm not here out of an a priori desire to experience the pleasure of disagreement, nor to engage in debate as an academic exercise (i.e. with truth and understanding being an incidental concern). Your request for data is in bad faith, and you're commenting in bad faith.
        • 8bitsrule 6y ago
          Twitter is a web-killer. Oh no, I mean, they want you there so badly.
      • CodeGlitch 6y ago
        They are large (popular) sites though. They have actively decided to not support RSS as they believe it is counter to their advantage. It's not like they don't have the resources to support RSS. What this means is that we have a moral obligation to support and push RSS in our work/spare time. This is something I now recognise I need to do at least.
    • k4c9x 6y ago
      Any decent RSS reader will find that link for you if you point it at the url that gets you the html. Twitter and Facebook no longer support it because they're predatory, I take it as just one more indication the entire platform should be avoided.
    • nickthegreek 6y ago
      I use Inoreader for my rss reader. it supports Twitter, faceboook (public pages) and YouTube even though they don’t have RSS feeds. So even though some sites kill there rss, the technologists provide.
      • hutattedonmyarm 6y ago
        Small nitpick: YouTube does have RSS feeds for every channel (and playlist), they just don’t have an icon in their UI linking to it
    • mkup 6y ago
      RSS-Bridge can convert twitter feeds to RSS feeds (this is a self-hosted solution). I host it on my server along with TT-RSS.
    • sp332 6y ago
      Twitter is extremely app-hostile. I wouldn't blame "technologists" for that, because most of them/us would prefer a more accessible Twitter feed.
    • snomad 6y ago
      Nitter has RSS feeds. Better UI too